QUOTE (Singing Pilgrim @ Oct 20 2004, 07:07 AM)
Simplebaby,
Matthew 17:12 provides Jesus interpretation of the disciples question in verse 10. Verse 11 is Jesus' acknowledgement of the teaching of Elijah coming before Messiah. He is telling the disciples that the teachers of the law are right, Elijah does come first and intruduces Messiah (restoration of all things). Even though the restoration is not complete, Jesus explains in verse 12 that Elijah has already come, that they did NOT recognize him. Then in the second half of the verse he describes the true nature of restoration God intended: that the Son of Man would suffer (Isaiah 53). The Jews misunderstood the form that restoration was provided.
Pilgrim
when yo read Romans, Paul quotes isaiah and Hosea, definitely pasages regardin g the northern tribes of israel, not the southern tribes we call jews...
Also, regrding Elijah.... Malachi is fulfilled....
The restoration was not with observation, which ws jewish expectation. IF we choose to reinterprete it in our day again as the jews did, then we are as guilty sa the pharisees were then...
This is the next part, continuation of the last post to help out a little:
In this part, I would like to explore the biblical reference which
negates the point that a prophet of the past would be the one to
come back as one of the witnesses....
The basic premise goes something like this:
During the final 3 1/2 years of great tribulation, there will be two
men who will prophecy and witness of the glory , power and holiness
of God. They will do so in great power, and as a result of their
ministry, many thousands will finally accept Jesus as their personal
Lord and Savior. Within this camp, it is almost unanimous in belief
that one of these is Elijah. The reason for this position is the
misunderstanding of the prophecy in Malachi that states the
following:
Malachi 4:5
-----------
5: Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of
the great and dreadful day of the LORD:
6: And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and
the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite
the earth with a curse.
In their opinion, this is not yet fulfilled. What they believe is
that Elijah must return, physically, again... in our day. However,
this position is in direct conflict with the teaching of our Lord
Jesus Christ. Conisder that as in our day we have great teachers of
the bible, scholars who know almost everything there is to know,
*yet many are wrong on many things), so too, in Christ's day, also,
thre were teachers who also held the belief that Elijah would return
physically...
Consider John 1:21:
------------------
19: And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and
Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou?
20: And he confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I am not the
Christ.
21: And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? And he saith, I
am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No.
In other words, they were expecting a live, physical appearing of a
man, who was born, in the flesh, called Elijah, that had somehow
dissappeared centuries before, to return again, in the same body,
with the same name, etc.... Before someone says to me, but John
said he wasn't Elijah, etc.. we will get into this furthur down.....
Today, many hold the same understanding and wold be asking any man
who appears in Jerusalem in the last days, "are you the Elijah"? So
far, many counterfeit messianic minded men have come forth calling
themselves Elijah, or Moses, etc....
I believe, if we read the bible with this frame of reference in
mind, we find something very interesting come forth. Jesus
clarifies the issue at hand as to the appearing of Elijah.
Jesus said something very interesting regarding the appearing of
Elijah in the flesh..... Let's look at Matthew's account
Matthew 11:
------------
11: Verily I say unto you, Among them that are born of women there
hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist: notwithstanding he
that is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.
12: And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of
heaven suffereth violence, and the violent take it by force.
13: For all the prophets and the law prophesied until John.
14: And if ye will receive it, this is Elias, which was for to come.
15: He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.
NOTICE A VERSE THAT IS ALWAYS OVERLOOKED.. it describes a mystery of
sorts...
---> verse 15.... "He that hath ears to hear, let him hear."
Where have we heard this before? in what context? Whenever Christ
says these words, he is uttering a mystery, something shrouded,
veiled from the normal eyes and ears of men.. thus, Chrsit says..
for those who have ears to hear, hear well what I just said... That
John the BAptist was the greatest of prophets....
and.. a (condition.. hear this well...), and "if" ye will receive
it, this is Elias, which wsa for to come.
What did our Lord say? This wsa the Elijah prophecized........
Christ didn't say that Elijah had to come in the flesh of centuries
before... Christ said those who have an ear, let them hear! The
day of the Lord, the judgement of the nations was suppossed to
happen in the first century but Israel denied their messiah and
after the sign of 40 years of probation, the temple was destroyed
and left desolate til the end) They were offered the kingdom,
refused it, so the kingdom was given to another...
If we overlook Christ's words, make them naught by sayiong, oh, but
that was just the spirit of Elijah, but Elijah is still to come, you
deny Christ's words here. Chrsit said if you will receive this word,
(he who has an ear, let them hear), this is Eliah... you can't get
any more direct than this.. He didn't say this is one who came in
the spirit of Elijah, alluding to maybe a physical appearance of
Elijah in the future, he said this is Elijah... But the call to
repentance, a voice crying in the wilderness fell mostly on deaf
ears... israel did not repent.... many's heart did not turn to the
fathers. had they believed Moses, they would have believed me,
(Christ).. thus, a cursed people were scattered into the world,
(lest I strike the world with a curse.. malachi 4:6)
continuing.....
REmember this.... John's failure to correctly understand what had
been written in Malachi did not change the fact that Jesus
considered the ministry of John the Baptist to be the fulfillment of
that Old Testament prophecy. After all, John's confusion about the
identity of Jesus did not change the fact that Jesus was the Messiah
in Matthew 11:2 and Luke 7:18. Did it?
It also seems that this confusion over the ministry of John
continued even with the interpretation of the transfiguration of
Christ. Right after the transfiguration, in the same gospel, Christ
had to again, reiterate the fact that:
Matthew 17:12 .... "Elijah has already come and they did not
recognize him ..." What Jesus was saying was that John the Baptist
fulfilled his ministry with the same power and spirit (ie. in the
same manner) as Elijah fulfilled his (Lk.1:17), and it was this fact
(that John walked in the spirit and power of Elijah) that fulfilled
the prophecy of Malachi4:5, not the appearance of Elijah on the
Mount of Transfiguration, and certainly not some future
reappearance. This is not an easy thing to understand, which is why
Jesus cautioned His disciples to seek spiritual ears so that they
could clearly understand that which was being said to them
concerning this topic.
Now, I know.. is this a mute pooint to go over all this? Actually
it is not and let me explain why. If we are to watch for Jesus'
return as we are told to do so, if w are to study and know the signs
of the times, how much is ist going to help us to be looking for a
fulfilment of a prophecy of "Elijah" if that was already fulfilled
200 years ago? Yet, who ARE the opnes awaiting Elijah? They are
the children of those who refused to believe Chrsit in the first
century, those who didn't have an ear to hear. And during passover,
they leave an open seat for Elijah.. (because in their mind, messiah
still has not come and Elijah is the forerunner), since they d not
believe in Chrsit as the messiah, then Elijah is still future....
Now, regarding the second witness, many believe it is Moses.... or
even Enoch.
the argument regarding Enoch rests in the verse of scripture that
says :
Hebrews 11:5
------------
5: By faith Enoch was translated that he should not see death; and
was not found, because God had translated him: for before his
translation he had this testimony, that he pleased God.
and since elsewhere in hebrews it says the following:
Hebrews 9:27
-------------
27: And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the
judgment:
they believe that Elijah and Enoch didn't die and since all are
appointed to die once, they have to come back.
First off, the scripture is taken totally out of context. If it is
interpreted this way, then no one who is raptured goes to heaven, no
one passes from life without going thru death first. Thus, all who
are raptured have to die first...
Enoch and Elijah should not be viewed as the only two men who must
yet face death, so must come back. Rather, they should be viewed as
part of the pattern which God has set up showing us that His desire
for us is not death and destruction, but life in its fullest (John
10:10-12). And that life includes the possibility held out for us in
I Cor.15:51-54, which is being alive and remaining at the coming of
the Lord with out first having tasted of physical death. To insist
upon the physical death of Enoch and Elijah is in fact an instance
on our part that God break His own pattern. I hope that offers
enough meat for now to consider the pattern set up.
The issue with the Elijah/Moses scenario comes from passages in
REvelation wh8ich speak of the miracles performed, thus, pointing to
Moses. However, both the Elijah/Enoch and Elijah/Moses viewpoints
seem to ignore the clear teachings of Jesus in Luke 16:19-31 which
contains the account of Lazarus and the Rich Man.
Luke 16:
--------
19: There was a certain rich man, which was clothed in purple and
fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day:
20: And there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, which was laid at
his gate, full of sores,
21: And desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich
man's table: moreover the dogs came and licked his sores.
22: And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by
the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was
buried;
23: And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth
Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.
24: And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and
send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and
cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.
25: But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime
receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but
now he is comforted, and thou art tormented.
26: And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf
fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot;
neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence.
27: Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father, that thou wouldest
send him to my father's house:
28: For I have five brethren; that he may testify unto them, lest
they also come into this place of torment.
29: Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the prophets; let
them hear them.
30: And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from
the dead, they will repent.
31: And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets,
neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.
As you will notice from verse 27, the Rich Man was requesting that
some former resident of earth return from paradise to witness to his
five brothers so that they would believe and not end up as did the
Rich Man. Abraham's response was clear, "... if they do not listen
to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if
someone rises from the dead." (Lk.16:31).
If it would have been no good to send Elijah and Moses back to earth
then, (and God, who does not lie, said it would), why would it now
all of a sudden make more sense to physically send them to a world
which has not only rejected them before, but has also rejected the
very Savior they were preaching about? (Acts 3:24 & 7:52)
Lastly, please consider this....
On the Mount of Transfiguration Moses and Elijah did reappear on the
earth transfigured with Christ. The transfiguration shows us that
Moses (representing the Law), and Elijah (symbolizing the prophets)
disappeared, leaving only Jesus (Matthew 17:8 and Luke9:36).
In Luke 24:44 Jesus said ... "Everything must be fulfilled that is
written about Me in the Law of Moses, the prophets and the Psalms"
Jesus also said that He would fulfill the law (Matthew 5:17-18),
which he did:
Romans 7:6
Colossians 2:13-14
Ephesians 2:15
Therefore, the witness of Moses is no longer required, which is why
on the Mount of Transfiguration, he disappeared. In fact, it is the
continual witness of Moses today which hinders so many people in the
receiving of their salvation experience
2 Corinthians 3:15 ... "15: But even unto this day, when Moses is
read, the vail is upon their heart"
Also, Jesus said in Matthew 11:13 that all the prophets prophesied
until John the baptist. On the Mount of Transfiguration we see that
Elijah, who symbolized the prophets, also disappeared. Just as
salvation does not come about from the witness of the Law, so also
does it not come about from the witness of the prophets. Jesus was
the only one of the three who remained on the Mount of
Transfiguration. Jesus is representative of the Psalms of
Luke.24:44. It is the Psalms, the songs the love of God for the
World (John 3: 16) that will witness to the world in these end
times, not Moses & Elijah/ Enoch. The world will know we are
Christians by our love (John 13:35), not by our outward actions
(Law) or knowledge (prophets) (see I Cor. 13:1-3).
This was by far,not a tight, neat package but it offered a few
things to consider, enough to place doubt in the current theology
out there regarding two prophets from the past coming back....
Gotta run for now.. will continue tudy sa soon sa some time avails...
God Bless
CArmine
ps....
just a last point.. MAlachi's prophecy regrding Elijah had a conditioin..."lest I strike the world with a curse".
the denial of Elijah's mesage was teh desolation of JEruslaem and the exile of a "cursed people" from Jerusalem, a people who denied the son, (thus denied the father).. these were those of the rabbinic camp.. the early church had it's jews and Israealites, Pauls proves it, he was of the tribe of Benjamin, proving God did not leave his people alone but gave them grace also to come in.. (only the remnant did, as we know from all generations)
This iwas Elijah that was to come.. just as Chrsit wsa teh messiah that was to come. They rejected both Elijah and Chrsit.. the end days, the same thing happens when antichrist of the jews re-establishes and sows back up, the torn veil and re establishes animal scrifice, pouring animal blood over rthe sacrificed blood of the lamb of God, (covering Chrsit's blood with animal blood)
They will get their expectations but it is called the false prophet and the beast.
WE are buying into jewish expectation as if all they had wsa the timing wsa off, RATHER THAN KNOW Christ didn't correct their timing, Christ corrected their understanding. A MAJOR DIFFERENCE....... MAJOR.........
Chrsitians in dispensaltional theology think Christ only corrected their timing.... thus justifying the pharisees as to their interpretation, not timing.....
Elijah came, they dind't see it.. the kingdom of God does NOT, I repeat, NOT come with observation!
Chrsit said it.. it doesn't get any simpler than that. Who is going to contradict the savior?
In these last days, every single jewish expectation has become a christian reality in dispensational thinking. they believe in an earthl kingdom, (jewish expectation of the first century) an Elijah that comes before hand wtih a messiah that appears sudenly in their temple........
The joining in of the two stickes happened in the first century and continues as God continues to bring gentiles and the hosue of israel together as ONE in the branch/stick which was the house of Judah, (first century remnant)..... as long as we think that was not fulfilled, we buy into jewish fables.....
Regarding Elijah, Christ said.."he who has an ear, let him hear" it is a mystery fulfilled in John.... When Chrsit comes back, ne comes for a ready bride, not for half a bride and conversion at his coming, that is NOT BIBLICAL.......... a rady bride means teh bride is ready when he shows up, they don't convert at the appearing, it is too late.. (again, the jews lost the blessing and the kingdom 9which did not come with observation) was given to another. the role of evangelism of the world went to another rather than anational jewish state, 9again, this is jewish expectation leavened into christianity) that the jews will proseletyze the world from jerusalem over 1000 years...
gotta run but think on thes things... Elijah wold have come had ou accepted John. (in other words, the promises given for ou wold have happened had ou accepted him..)that is like saying as a father, I would have given you the car had you been good.. it doesn't mean youa re getting it in the future cuz i promised it to you, ou lost out, the car, as a reality is already here....
simple baby... malachi.."lest I strike the world with a curse" condition and respnse for rejection of Elijah