Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Barcelona Summit Nov. 27th And 28th
Christian-Forum.net > Current Events > Signs of the Times
Karen R.
This is the 10th Anniversary of Solana's Barcelona Process of 1995 held in Barcelona, Spain. Well................this could be "it" -- the "confirming" we've been waiting for.

http://www.euromedbarcelona.org/EN/Proceso...QueEsElProceso/

This is a very good site that explains alot. It would be better if you read it yourself. There is, however, some key things I'd like to point out.

* The Barcelona Process was organized by Solana ( who is connected to the number 666 two different significant ways that relate to his high position.)

* It is a covenant with "many" (Dan. 9:27)
QUOTE
Full members of the Barcelona Process are:

25 Member States of the European Union. 2 countries, Romania and Bulgaria, that are candidates to join the European Union, which have already signed  an Accession Agreement
Croatia (a candidate to join the EU, which began accession talks on 3rd October)  
10 countries from the southern Mediterranean shore: Algeria, Palestinian Authority, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia, and Turkey (already part of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership, the latter began EU accession talks on 3rd October)
The European Parliament, the European Commission, and the Secretariat-General of the Council of the EU


* It is a "confirming" of a (previous) covenant (Dan. 9:27)

QUOTE
The Barcelona Summit, to be held the 27th and 28th of November, will signify the political reinforcement of a unique process of regional co-operation, initiated in 1995 when Spain held the European Union Presidency.


QUOTE
Content
The Barcelona Summit aims to launch a new phase in Euro-Mediterranean relations, to meet the demands created by major changes on the international scene, and within the European Union itself.


* Another name for the Barcelona Process is the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership a.k.a. "Euro-Med" *I think this is so interesting:*
Look at the letters! Euro-Med = EU Romed

* The reason behind the Euro-Med is "Peace and Safety"

* The Neighborhood Policy, or ENP, is a "strengthening" of the Euro-Med. It comes into full effect January 1st, 2007 and ends December 31st, 2013 - a period of 7 years. Many "Action Plans" with Mediterranean countries, including Israel and the PA (that doesn't even have a state yet) are already in place. These Action Plans are changes that partner countries must make before the slated timeframe of the ENP. If they comply with the rules and regulations that the EU sets forth, partner countries reap many financial benefits and rewards. (In other words -- they are being bribed to change.)

* Solana has scored a position in Gaza.
QUOTE
Political control

· The EU's Political and Security Committee will exercise, under the responsibility of the EU Council, the political control and strategic direction of the Mission. High Representative Javier Solana will give guidance to the Head of Mission through the EU Special Representative for the MEPP.

http://www.eu-del.org.il/english/whatsnew.asp?id=518


* Solana has said previously that during this Barcelona Summit on Nov 27th and 28th that a suprise announcement will be made. I wonder what it could be? It could be REAL GOOD!!!

I'll be watching!
Leia
Thank you Karen, you might want to make sure Dove see this.

I am watching with you and expect to see the peices fit nicely together.

leia
daysofnoah
At risk of making a shameless plug, I wrote an article about this on my website a couple of days ago:

www.daysofnoah.org/feature

Enjoy!
Marta
Hmmmmmmmm.......wonder what his little suprise will be on Nov 27th and 28th. ohmy.gif
Karen R.
Well......to put it mildly.....my stomach did a flip-flop when I read a certain part in this article. I put that part in red with big letters so you'd not have a chance to miss it. Maybe your stomach will do a flip-flop too.


QUOTE
w w w . h a a r e t z . c o m


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Last update - 09:14 25/11/2005
Toward a partnership of hope
By Javier Solana

This week we mark the 10th anniversary of the Euro-Mediterranean partnership by returning to the city where it all began: Barcelona. Ten years ago I was particularly proud to preside over the launch of a unique venture: the "Barcelona process." At the heart of that lay an inspiring vision of our relations with the Mediterranean partners, but also a call to duty. To create a zone of shared security and shared solidarity, of open markets and open societies across the Mediterranean. The way we pledged to achieve these goals was through true partnership and close cooperation between governments and citizens.

The launching of the Barcelona process was an integral part of Europe's response to the post-Cold War situation and to globalization. Above all it was a political act. It not only recognized our interdependence, but also created a new "Mediterranean identity." In the past 10 years, there is much that we have achieved. We are working together across the full spectrum of government responsibilities: economy, security, governance and more. No issue is considered "too sensitive" to put on the agenda. The Barcelona process has also solidified a network of interlocutors beyond governments and it has been a great laboratory of ideas.

But clearly our world has also changed since 1995. This is the post-9/11 era and we have to come to terms with it. In many respects, the Mediterranean runs the risk of becoming a dangerous crossroads of many of the perils of the modern world: poverty, poor governance, terrorism, human trafficking and political extremism. At the same time, this sea remains our joint heritage and a unique platform for cooperation. I believe we should remain true to the original Barcelona vision, while adjusting our partnership to focus on new challenges. Above all, we must inject a greater dose of urgency in everything we do. The problems are piling up fast while our capacity to respond has to keep pace.

The Euro-Med partnership is not the only international framework for multilateral cooperation with this region. But it is the most developed and in many ways preferred one. The reason is that it promotes both security and reform simultaneously. We reject those who insist that we should sequence things, saying that either conflict resolution or political reform must come first. Barcelona is about pursuing both reform and security at the same time.

It is true that the Barcelona process was born of the hopes of the Oslo peace talks. And clearly, the absence of peace between Israelis and Palestinians casts a shadow over our work. But Barcelona was about supporting the peace process, not supplanting it.

Moreover, we Europeans have been working nonstop to promote a peace accord. We have long been by far the largest donor to the Palestinians. We are now also engaged in the diplomatic process through the Quartet and in the area of security. Take our training efforts for the Palestinian police plus, our new mission as third-party monitors at a border-crossing in Gaza. These are big changes since 1995 when Europe was not directly engaged, either diplomatically or operationally, in the peace process.

Security and reform go hand in hand. Thus, we must step up our cooperation on new security threats and inject new impetus into our work on political and economic modernization. There can be no mistake: Promoting democracy, pluralism and human rights was part of the original Barcelona recipe. For us Europeans, these are essential values. That is why it is natural to seek to promote them abroad and why we are glad that our Mediterranean partners agree on their importance. We all know that successful governments must meet the aspirations of their people.

What are we doing concretely? We are providing monitoring and assistance for the organization of elections. This often attracts headlines. But we are also working on the "building blocks" of democracy, through support for civil society, by strengthening the capacities and independence of the judiciary, and by promoting respect for human rights.

Many Mediterranean countries say they want to advance on the path of political reform but that it should be home-grown and that they need help. I agree. So I am pleased that the EU will launch a so-called governance facility. This will not be a cosmetic initiative, but one that, over seven years, will offer several hundred million euros to those countries that are making the greatest efforts concerning governance reform. They can then spend the extra money on the priorities they have set themselves. This is what I call a true partnership for political reform.

We should also give more money to education and we will. Education is the silver bullet. Concretely, this means improving standards, eradicating illiteracy, reforming the curriculum, and ensuring equality between girls and boys. Education also means openness to each other's ideas. That is why we should increase international exchanges across the Mediterranean.

Managing the growing challenge of migration adroitly is another test of our partnership. Legal migration is an economic and demographic imperative for Europe, which must get better at integrating those who seek a better life on its shores. But illegal migration is often based on a cynical exploitation of the weak by human traffickers. All of us, countries of origin, transit and destination, have an interest in tackling these unscrupulous networks.

There will be a lot of speeches and declarations at the summit. Amid all this, let us remember that the Euro-Med partnership is there to serve our citizens, to prepare our societies for a challenging future. For me, the Barcelona process is essentially a project of hope and a means to banish hopelessness. It is our collective duty and our common interest to realize its full potential.

Javier Solana is the EU's high representative for the Common Foreign & Security Policy (CFSP).



http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/650043.html

So? How'd yours do?
lov4all
excl.gif ohmy.gif excl.gif
Leia
Tomorrow is the 27th. Do we have a time and channel?

leia
lov4all
Leia- This may help a little, but as yet I have not found an exact channel or station where we can watch the goings on.


Radio and television. The Summit’s official television broadcasts will be generated and distributed by Spanish National Television (TVE). The TVE liaison officer will be Francisco Cortés, e-mail: francisco.cortes@rtve.es. Radio broadcasts will be distributed by Spanish National Radio (RNE), and the liaison officer will be Ángel López Alcázar, e-mail: sub_emisiones.rne@rtve.es.

The above in green is directly from the official summit website:

http://www.euromedbarcelona.org/EN/Prensa/...rmacionGeneral/
lov4all
Ah Ha!!! :


http://www.euromedbarcelona.org/EN/Prensa/...isionesDirecto/



Live webcasts
Live webcasts of the following events during the Euro-Mediterranean Summit will be streamed on this channel:


Sunday 27th 9 p.m. Toast by HM the King at the dinner for Heads of State and of Government
Monday 28th 9 a.m. Remarks by HM the King at the Inaugural Session
Monday 28th 1 p.m. Final Press Conference

These webcasts will be provided in the original language, Spanish, as well as English, French, and Arabic.




The photos of the events, with EFE coverage through the "pool" system, may de viewed and will be ready for dowloading (in high resolution) in the following web site:

http://www.efeservicios.com/
User: efep5179
Password: 1pool2
Leia
QUOTE(lov4all @ Nov 26 2005, 07:42 PM)
Ah Ha!!!  :


http://www.euromedbarcelona.org/EN/Prensa/...isionesDirecto/



Live webcasts
Live webcasts of the following events during the Euro-Mediterranean Summit will be streamed on this channel:


Sunday 27th    9 p.m.  Toast by HM the King at the dinner for Heads of State and of Government
Monday 28th    9 a.m.  Remarks by HM the King at the Inaugural Session
Monday 28th   1 p.m. Final Press Conference

These webcasts will be provided in the original language, Spanish, as well as English, French, and Arabic.




The photos of the events, with EFE coverage through the "pool" system, may de viewed and will be ready for dowloading (in high resolution) in the following web site:

http://www.efeservicios.com/
User: efep5179
Password: 1pool2
[right][snapback]25284[/snapback][/right]


OK, so I have it on favorites...I just go to this at 9pm whos time? Why can't it just be on CNN like everything else?

Remember, you are talking to the one who still can't do a picture right.

leia
lov4all
At least you can DO a picture!! tongue.gif

I'm still working on that one.... tried this afternoon but just couldn't get it. I did get photoshop loaded though! Baby steps..... biggrin.gif

Anyway, good question! I'd guess 9pm their time, whatever that is. Maybe we could start a thread here when it starts if anyone happens upon it?

I'm sure CNN will have updates, sort of, but I just don't see this as something the general public is following.

For that matter, I can't see our media giving it too much detailed attention either. - - you know, that kind of stuff just isn't as important as whos getting married/divorced in Hollywood and other such important "news"! laugh.gif ph34r.gif laugh.gif


If someone figures out what time it would be on on the east coast, post it please? For all I know it could be at 2 in the morning!! wacko.gif
Miki
I just saw the original post this morning Karen...Thanks! We've been waiting.

The story will dribble out in pieces but l'm sure Shekel will have his comments.
It sure fits the time line.

user posted image
Marta
QUOTE(Miki @ Nov 27 2005, 07:17 AM)
I just saw the original post this morning Karen...Thanks!   We've been waiting.

The story will dribble out in pieces but l'm sure Shekel will have his comments.
It sure fits the time line.

user posted image
[right][snapback]25327[/snapback][/right]


Yes mammy....tomorrow? Hmmmmmmm.......

Karen,
Yes dear this does make your stomach do flip flops:

QUOTE
So I am pleased that the EU will launch a so-called governance facility. This will not be a cosmetic initiative, but one that, over seven years, will offer several hundred million euros to those countries that are making the greatest efforts concerning governance reform.


A SO-CALLED GOVERNANCE FACILTY....meaning exactly????

Did they just say the magic word...SEVEN YEARS...or actually...OVER SEVEN YEARS....SEVEN AND A HALF?

Whoa.............
Jeep
Hey I have been to barcelona....long long time ago.....if you go....don't eat the roast duck on the hillside restaurant near the beach.....



Jeep
Leia
Jeep, you crack me up.

Marta, the guy's face scares me. I mean it really creeps me out and gives me chills. Makes me want to shiver like a dog trying to shake off fleas.

Seven and a half, yes. And I am anxious to see what Sheckel has to say about the timing. I just can't see where this is NOT something.

you know, I played with him name and the list of number/letters you gave me...you don't know how much I appreciate that....and come up with nothing solid but it is kind of odd that JVW is 6 and S is 60, which is nothing probably but I just keeps being NOT other numbers like 8 or 2.

leia
Jeep
QUOTE(Leia @ Nov 27 2005, 11:32 PM)
Jeep, you crack me up.

Marta, the guy's face scares me.  I mean it really creeps me out and gives me chills.  Makes me want to shiver like a dog trying to shake off fleas. 

Seven and a half, yes.  And I am anxious to see what Sheckel has to say about the timing.  I just can't see where this is NOT something.

you know, I played with him name and the list of number/letters you gave me...you don't know how much I appreciate that....and come up with nothing solid but it is kind of odd that JVW is 6  and S is 60, which is nothing probably but I just keeps being NOT other numbers like 8 or 2.

leia
[right][snapback]25591[/snapback][/right]





just please don't eat the duck if ya go


Jeep
Zephaniah
QUOTE(Karen R. @ Nov 16 2005, 02:26 AM)
This is the 10th Anniversary of Solana's Barcelona Process of 1995 held in Barcelona, Spain. Well................this could be "it"  --  the "confirming" we've been waiting for.

http://www.euromedbarcelona.org/EN/Proceso...QueEsElProceso/

This is a very good site that explains alot. It would be better if you read it yourself. There is, however, some key things I'd like to point out.

* The Barcelona Process was organized by Solana ( who is connected to the number 666 two different significant ways that relate to his high position.)

* It is a covenant with "many" (Dan. 9:27)
QUOTE
Full members of the Barcelona Process are:

25 Member States of the European Union. 2 countries, Romania and Bulgaria, that are candidates to join the European Union, which have already signed  an Accession Agreement
Croatia (a candidate to join the EU, which began accession talks on 3rd October)  
10 countries from the southern Mediterranean shore: Algeria, Palestinian Authority, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia, and Turkey (already part of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership, the latter began EU accession talks on 3rd October)
The European Parliament, the European Commission, and the Secretariat-General of the Council of the EU


* It is a "confirming" of a (previous) covenant (Dan. 9:27)

QUOTE
The Barcelona Summit, to be held the 27th and 28th of November, will signify the political reinforcement of a unique process of regional co-operation, initiated in 1995 when Spain held the European Union Presidency.


QUOTE
Content
The Barcelona Summit aims to launch a new phase in Euro-Mediterranean relations, to meet the demands created by major changes on the international scene, and within the European Union itself.


* Another name for the Barcelona Process is the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership a.k.a. "Euro-Med" *I think this is so interesting:*
Look at the letters! Euro-Med = EU Romed

* The reason behind the Euro-Med is "Peace and Safety"

* The Neighborhood Policy, or ENP, is a "strengthening" of the Euro-Med. It comes into full effect January 1st, 2007 and ends December 31st, 2013 - a period of 7 years. Many "Action Plans" with Mediterranean countries, including Israel and the PA (that doesn't even have a state yet) are already in place. These Action Plans are changes that partner countries must make before the slated timeframe of the ENP. If they comply with the rules and regulations that the EU sets forth, partner countries reap many financial benefits and rewards. (In other words -- they are being bribed to change.)

* Solana has scored a position in Gaza.
QUOTE
Political control

· The EU's Political and Security Committee will exercise, under the responsibility of the EU Council, the political control and strategic direction of the Mission. High Representative Javier Solana will give guidance to the Head of Mission through the EU Special Representative for the MEPP.

http://www.eu-del.org.il/english/whatsnew.asp?id=518


* Solana has said previously that during this Barcelona Summit on Nov 27th and 28th that a suprise announcement will be made. I wonder what it could be? It could be REAL GOOD!!!

I'll be watching!
[right][snapback]23135[/snapback][/right]



On herb peters site, he thinks that "Solana will either stand down and make way for the real AC" or "Come to an agreement, which will be officially announced on the 1st of jan of 2006.
Zephaniah
QUOTE(Leia @ Nov 16 2005, 03:00 AM)
Thank you Karen, you might want to make sure Dove see this. 

I am watching with you and expect to see the peices fit nicely together.

leia
[right][snapback]23144[/snapback][/right]



biggrin.gif I've seen it...

Yep, everything is slowly being put into place.
Zephaniah
Euro-Med summit battles to agree on terrorism code

QUOTE
user posted image



BARCELONA (Reuters) - Ministers from the European Union and 10 Mediterranean nations worked into the night to try to overcome differences over a code of conduct against terrorism and to agree a statement on Middle East peace.

The Barcelona summit, which began on Sunday, was meant to be the first time that leaders of a group that includes Israelis and Palestinians as well as the 25 EU countries had met.

Previous meetings of the Euro-Mediterranean group, launched in Barcelona 10 years ago, have been at foreign minister level.

Nearly all the EU leaders turned up. But poor health or political problems at home kept most of the Mediterranean leaders -- including Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, Algerian President Abdelaziz Bouteflika and Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon -- away.

That undermined the prestige of a meeting aimed at boosting cooperation across the Mediterranean -- something many leaders think is vital to combat terrorism and illegal immigration.

Nevertheless, European leaders insisted that the summit, which ends on Monday, will produce important results, including a pioneering code of conduct against terrorism.

Late on Sunday, foreign ministers were still battling to resolve differences over the definition of terrorism in the code of conduct and over references to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in a proposed common vision statement.

Syria and other Arab partners want the EU to distinguish between terrorism and the right to resist occupation, while the Europeans and Israel oppose any qualification of terrorism.

"The meetings are very intense. They are going on now and will continue into the night," a Spanish official said.

Spain -- co-hosting the summit with current EU president Britain -- has lobbied for greater EU commitment to North Africa. Madrid believes more prosperity in Africa will help stem the flow of migrants desperate to reach wealthy Europe and counter extremist beliefs that feed terrorism.

MADRID BOMBINGS

Spain has sought to step up cooperation with Morocco since the March 11, 2004 Madrid train bombings by Islamic extremists that killed 191 people. Many of those arrested in connection with the bombings are Moroccan.

European statesmen put a brave face on the poor turnout by their Mediterranean partners, but one European official said privately they had missed a rare opportunity to win more attention and support from Europe.

Only two -- Turkey and the Palestinian Authority -- sent their top leaders to the conference.

Sharon and Mubarak pulled out because of the political situation at home while Bouteflika was flown to Paris on Saturday for urgent hospital tests.

The presidents of Syria and Lebanon were persuaded to stay away because they are in diplomatic quarantine over the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri.

An Arab diplomat said some leaders, such as Tunisian President Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali, preferred to stay home rather than be lectured by the Europeans on democracy, human rights and freedom of expression.

On the streets of Barcelona, several thousand anti-summit demonstrators staged two marches under the banner "No to the Mediterranean of capital and war" on Sunday.

The summit set the stage for an Israeli-Palestinian meeting, at which Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Ehud Olmert urged Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to disarm the militant Hamas group.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, making her summit debut, sought to reassure Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan at a separate meeting that she would not stand in the way of Turkey's negotiations to join the EU.

http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/newsArticl...DITERRANEAN.xml


Barcelona summit more Euro than Med as Arab leaders stay away

QUOTE
The first-ever Euro-Mediterranean summit opens on Sunday, but most Mideast leaders have chosen to stay away from gathering where the EU will be pushing for further measures to combat terrorism and illegal immigration.
British Prime Minister Tony Blair co-hosts the summit to mark the 10th anniversary of the so-called Euromed process, which aims to boost ties between the European Union and 10 countries stretching from Morocco to Israel.

While another aim of the gathering on Sunday and on Monday in the Spanish city where the partnership was launched in 1995 will be to accelerate efforts to set up a free trade area covering both the EU and the Mediterranean, terrorism has moved to the top of the agenda.

British officials said ahead of the summit Blair will seek pledges from his European and Mediterranean partners to endorse a "Code of Conduct on Countering Terrorism", as well as greater cooperation such as in sharing intelligence and managing border movements.

However, the leaders of most Arab states and Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon elected not to show up.

Critics say Euromed has achieved little over the last decade, and EU officials admit to shortcomings -- saying that is why the process needs to be re-launched.

"Our summit will aim to put the partnership on a sounder and stronger footing, and take courageous decisions to meet the challenges we face as we enter a new phase," European Commission chief Jose Manuel Barroso said ahead of the gathering.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1557869,00050003.htm



Barcelona summit begins with important absences

QUOTE
user posted image


Spanish prime minister Rodríguez Zapatero, in his speech before the Euro-Mediterranean summit being held in Barcelona, asked that no hasty judgements be made on the summit, and said that he would "work with all governments, and there will be positive results." Zapatero expressed his respect for those leaders who did not attend the summit, including the presidents of Syria, Lebanon, Algeria, Egypt, and Tunisia, and US secretary of state Condoleezza Rice.

The rotating presidency of the Council of Europe, currently in the hands of the UK, unsuccessfully tried to arrive at a consensus definition of terrorism. The Arab countries wanted to differentiate terrorism from "the right to resistance," which Israel would not accept. 

Said Zapatero, "Of course I respect those heads of state who for one reason or another, and I can assure you that practically all of them had reasons, could not be at this summit, but all the administrations will be here, and the results will be positive. Let's make judgments about the summit when the summit ends, and let's not make a prejudgment before it begins, because the fact it is being held is in itself of great importance." He also refused to "give an opinion about other opinions," when asked about the PP's theory that the absences happened because US secretary of state Rice decided not to attend.

The administration said, in a press release, that it was "very satisfied" at the response to the summit by countries like Morocco and Turkey, and the Palestinian Authority. It said that some of the absent heads of state stayed home because of radical positions, like Syria, Algeria, and Lebanon, and others because of their reticence to bring up questions related with certain domestic political issues, like Egypt and Tunisia. 

During the first day of the summit, no agreement was reached on a proposed "antiterrorist code of conduct." The success of the summit is based on resolving this issue. The differences between the Arab countries and Israel are centered on the Arabs' wish to differentiate between "terrorism" and "legitimate resistance to foreign occupation." Israel considered this "unacceptable." The foreign ministers of the countries in attendance will now try to resolve the issue. 

http://www.spainherald.com/2144.html
Zephaniah
QUOTE(Leia @ Nov 28 2005, 03:32 AM)
Jeep, you crack me up.

Marta, the guy's face scares me.  I mean it really creeps me out and gives me chills.  Makes me want to shiver like a dog trying to shake off fleas. 

Seven and a half, yes.  And I am anxious to see what Sheckel has to say about the timing.  I just can't see where this is NOT something.

you know, I played with him name and the list of number/letters you gave me...you don't know how much I appreciate that....and come up with nothing solid but it is kind of odd that JVW is 6  and S is 60, which is nothing probably but I just keeps being NOT other numbers like 8 or 2.

leia
[right][snapback]25591[/snapback][/right]

Javier Solana isn't even he's real name and surname, he was born Francisco Madariaga. A reason has never been given into why he changed his name and surname, but maybe his first name and surname add up to 666?

I've had a friend try it and he said it doe's.

But his 2nd "Javier" and third name "solana" doesn't, which in all adds up to 736.. wacko.gif Maybe he knew what his name added up to and then decided to go with his 2nd and third name to help hide himself.
Jeep
Yep....just don't order the roast duck, I can't stress that enough....




Jeep
Zephaniah
LOL JEEP!
Zephaniah
Leia, your not alone on that one! There's just something about him that makes me shiver
Zephaniah
For students of Bible prophecy, this interview with Solana is a must read ->

QUOTE
Tough days ahead

The list of concerns that High Commissioner for European Union Foreign and Security Policies Javier Solana has to attend to merits the length of his title. Not only does his job consist of coordinating the wide variety of European views on foreign and security policies, but also to try and relay a coherent EU policy to the outside world.

Born in Madrid in 1942 Solana is a solid- state physics professor. It might be this particular scientific discipline that grants Solana his ability to closely monitor developing situations, carefully react and coordinate what might appear as unreconcilable stances. When the 25 EU member states ratify their constitution, Solana will become the first European foreign minister, a job that many European and Arab diplomats believe he is destined to have.

As foreign minister, Solana's responsibilities will increase in both weight and number. As things stand, he is widely considered the top European diplomat, and has held several key posts, including foreign minister of Spain and the secretary-general of NATO, and seems ready for his next job: making the European voice heard on key regional and global affairs.

He was in Cairo last week for talks with top Egyptian officials and a number of Middle East foreign ministers, who were in town for a conference of states neighbouring Iraq.

Solana spoke on the Arab-Israeli conflict, Iraq and Sudan. "For us these are issues of direct interest that we have to work on with our friends in the region. We have been working hard and we will continue to do so," he said. According to Solana, the challenges in Iraq are particularly complex and difficult right now. "There is an unmistakable state of instability that has to be addressed in a way that maintains Iraqi sovereignty and territorial unity," he said.

As for the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, he believes that at present there is virtually no peace effort worth speaking of, and that the issue is rife with "disturbing" challenges to the peace process in which the "EU has invested much effort", especially within the framework of the Quartet. And in Sudan, Solana believes there is a terrible human tragedy, which the EU "is willing to do all it can to help [solve] politically or logistically".

It seems that as far as Solana is concerned, Iraq and Sudan are both very worrying, but the Arab-Israeli front is the number one concern. The ongoing state of Israeli-Palestinian agitation is the last thing the expanded EU wants to have happening by its new borders.

"We believe the Middle East peace process is crucial," Solana said. Perhaps this is the reason that prompted top European diplomats to stress last week that, whether the Israelis like it or not, the EU will keep pushing for peace. "We know that it is not an easy job and that the tension is very high right now, but we also know that we have the roadmap that was accepted by the Arab states... We also have the Arab peace initiative that was adopted at the Arab summit in Beirut a couple of years ago," he said.

But can Solana cooperate with an Israeli government that seems unwilling to work for peace? After all, the EU and Solana have been shunned more than once by Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's government that has at times accused the EU of exercising a pro- Palestinian bias. Sharon has often made himself unavailable for Solana's requests for meetings or even telephone conversations.

The most recent incident of EU-Israeli confrontation followed the EU vote in favour of a resolution adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 20 June, which called for Israel to knock down the separation wall it has been building on Palestinian occupied territories.

"We are well aware of the Israeli security concerns. We know that they have a reason to worry about their security and we believe that it is their right to maintain their security," Solana said. "But we also happen to believe that the occupied Palestinian territories should not be a construction site for this wall. We have always opposed the construction of this wall on the Palestinian territories and this is what we are trying to explain to our friends in Israel."

The UN General Assembly vote was hailed as a major legal and political victory in Palestine and many Arab capitals. It came in the wake of a ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) that slammed the Israeli government for building the wall on Palestinian territories and for undertaking other hostile measures against the Palestinians. Going to the ICJ was an Arab initiative that was opposed by the EU, a stance that many Arab capitals described as a covert European attempt to appease to Israel.

But Solana categorically disagrees with both Arab and Israeli critics. He believes that both sides fail to see the simple facts. "When the UN General Assembly voted on whether or not it should pursue the legal opinion of the ICJ on the wall, we voted against this move because we did not think the ICJ had the mandate to deal with this issue, but once the ICJ decided it was its mandate to deal with it, we accepted that.

"As for our recent vote in the General Assembly, that concerns our basic stance that while the Israelis have every right to defend themselves, they also a responsibility to incorporate Palestinian needs, including the humanitarian issues that have been negatively affected by the wall," Solana said.

Solana would not say whether or not he believes the Sharon government is capable of making peace with the Palestinians. He refused to go too deeply into the issue, however, and replied: "We are trying to keep a very balanced approach between the two sides and stress to both sides that peace is in everyone's interest."

Another question that Solana was not willing to address was whether the Arab-Israeli peace process would pick up soon. "We will continue to support the roadmap and encourage any possible political dialogue."

"After all, Arabs and Israelis have been meeting under the umbrella of the Barcelona Process during the past few years," he said. "The Euro-Mediterranean forum of the Barcelona Process, that I personally helped launch back in 1995, has offered and will continue to offer a good atmosphere for Arabs and Israelis to meet and talk," he said. European mediators are also present at the meeting.

Solana is willing to acknowledge that despite the progress made in the Barcelona Process, prospects of political, security, economic and cultural cooperation for the states around the Mediterranean have been undermined by the ongoing state of Arab-Israeli tension.

In 2005 the Barcelona Process will celebrate its 10th anniversary. "We are working on a plan to celebrate this anniversary and when I say celebrate, I am not just talking about champagne, but a new push towards deep political dialogue, social cooperation and improved economic relations." While he did not divulge the specifics of the celebration plan, he did say that his celebration would involve a clear message promoting "cooperation".

Solana is confident that the Barcelona Process will not be overshadowed by any of the new "initiatives" that have been proposed by several Western capitals, including the New Neighbourhood Initiative of the European Union -- including for Middle Eastern reform and progress--, because that has its own dynamism and mechanism, and because it has proven to provide "a solid framework for relations around the Mediterranean".

He also does not necessarily see an overlap between the Barcelona Process and any other framework that concerned countries might decide on. After all, the EU has an independent rapport with each Arab state, "because these countries tend to have different economic and social contexts". The soon-to- be-EU foreign minister believes that it is in the interest of Europe to pursue consistent dialogue with the Arab world. "We talk with the Arab League very often on all issues of mutual concern," to explain stances and discuss differences.

Along with the Arab-Israeli conflict, Iraq, and Sudan, the association agreements between the EU and Arab states are the issue Arab and Muslim communities in Europe have recently brought to the attention of Arab-European meetings. Some Arab officials are making no secret of their deep -- and they say legitimate -- concern that Arab and Muslim communities in Europe have often been subject to unfair treatment both from their communities and, at times, the European governments.

Solana accepts that there have been some "sad incidents" where people of Arab and Muslim origin in Europe encountered some unjust treatment. But he promptly adds that there have also been cases where Arabs and Muslims in Europe have got themselves involved in some "sad acts of terror". "But I refuse to generalise in either case... I believe that we do not have a dramatic problem, but we do talk and we truly hope that the concept of co-existence will always prevail," he said.

But why is the issue of anti-Arab and anti- Muslim sentiment not addressed with the same enthusiasm that the European countries show when faced with allegations of growing anti-Semitism? After all it was only a few months ago that the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) held a special conference on anti-Semitism and issued a set of rules and procedures to be followed to combat any signs of showing prejudice against Jews? "It is not a matter of meetings. All issues of concern are discussed at different levels within the European communities," he said. He added: "I believe that the sentiment of co-existence is very strong in Europe and it is not going to be destroyed."

http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2004/701/re13.htm


Herb peter has his say ->

QUOTE
Why will Javier Solana be celebrating in 2005? According to this fascinating interview, Solana will be celebrating the 10th anniversary of his 1995 Barcelona Process Read about it here. 

For students of Bible prophecy, this interview is a must read. In fact, I can't think of anything I've read lately that has more intrigued me. So, I recommend that everybody take their time and read it all the way through.

But before we discuss the Barcelona Process, I want you to notice something in Solana's interview.

As for the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, he believes that at present there is virtually no peace effort worth speaking of, and that the issue is rife with "disturbing" challenges to the peace process in which the "EU has invested much effort", especially within the framework of the Quartet ... the Arab-Israeli front is the number one concern. The ongoing state of Israeli-Palestinian agitation is the last thing the expanded EU wants to have happening by its new borders.

Now here's why this is so fascinating to me. In my book, Recommendation 666, I quote a comment about the coming Antichrist made by a noted Bible prophecy scholar named J. Dwight Pentecost. In his 1961 book, Prophecy for Today, Pentecost states:

This world ruler when he comes to authority in the European federation of nations will look over to Palestine and see that the Arab-Israeli dispute threatens world peace.

Has Solana yet come to power over the European federation we known as the European Union? Some think he has. According to this report, after the EU's new constitution is ratified by the member states, Solana will have sole control over the EU's foreign and security policy Read about it here.

What does this have to do with the Barcelona Process? Well, the Barcelona Process is part of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership for Peace that Solana negotiated with Israel and eleven other Mediterranean nations back in 1995. And, it is evident by this interview that Solana plans on using this agreement as the basis for bringing peace to the Middle East.

Now in 2005, Solana's Barcelona Process will have it's 10th anniversary. And, Solana says he is planning on celebrating it. Not with a big party -- with a big push to peace. Here's what Solana's said:

We are working on a plan to celebrate this anniversary and when I say celebrate, I am not just talking about champagne, but a new push towards deep political dialogue, social cooperation and improved economic relations.

The interviewer went on to say Solana didn't make himself clear about what he was planning to do. But, for us students of Bible prophecy, it shouldn't be too hard to guess.

No, I'm not saying Solana is the Antichrist. I'm only pointing out -- as I do in my book -- Solana is doing some of the things we've been expecting for a long time now the coming Antichrist to do. And, almost no one is reporting it.

So, should I say it again?

Stay tuned!!!

http://www.fulfilledprophecy.com/solana...elebration.html
Zephaniah
Please note before reading. I am not saying Javier Solana is the Antichrist. All I am trying to do here is compare well known prophecies in the Scriptures concerning the Antichrist and the feats he will accomplish, with public knowledge of the man, Javier Solana. Another man could well fulfil all these prophecies. But the best we can do until "that Wicked" is finally revealed (2nd Thessalonians 2:8) is to make an educated guess as much as the signs of the times allow. I don't know if the European Neighbourhood Policy is the "seven year covenant with many" or not, all we can do is wait and see.
Luke 21:28
And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh.

He shall use peace to destroy many (Daniel 8:25)
Javier Solana has brokered peace agreements throughout the world. His role as High Representative was initially to be involved in bringing Russia and the Caucasus regions closer to Europe. He would also be heavily involved in the Middle East.

Quote: "666. In December the Vienna European Council expressed the opinion that the Secretary-General of the Council and High Representative for the CFSP should be appointed as soon as possible and be a personality with a strong political profile. It invited the Council to prepare common strategies on Russia, Ukraine, the Mediterranean region and the western Balkans, on the understanding that the first would be on Russia. Welcoming the new impetus given to the debate on a common European policy on security and defence, the European Council also noted that the CFSP should be backed by credible operational capabilities

He was a key player in brokering Iran's suspension of its nuclear programme, although this deal has since fallen through. He is also involved in bringing Turkey closer to the EU. The current peace process in the Middle East is much a result of this man's doing. Israel initially refused to meet the Quartet who were pushing for the Gaza disengagement to kick-start the "roadmap to peace".

Quote: "Some officials believe Sharon doesn't want Israelis meeting with the Quartet envoys to make sure his "unilateral" pullout plan doesn't look like a diplomatic move. Sharon has portrayed the plan as a security measure meant to reduce friction between Israelis and Palestinians.

The EU has pledged to boost the Palestinian economy with 60 million Euros, and Europe is already training the Palestinian police force. All efforts for peace in the Middle East are already supported by the EU through the Barcelona Process, which started in 1995. When asked how he has been so successful, Javier Solana says the key to his achievement is to never make enemies, and never ask a question to which you do not know or like the answer to.

Javier Solana is now personally involved in the EU's peace efforts in the Middle East. He will be visiting Gaza, Israel and the surrounding nations to co-ordinate a new agreement brokered with the Palestinians, the Israelis and the Quartet (EU, UN, US and Russia) whereby the EU will monitor the Gaza border with Egypt at Rafah. This is the first time Israel has even allowed a third party to monitor border crossings during the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. And that it is the EU is especially significant - seeing just a few years ago Ariel Sharon told Javier Solana that the EU should let Israel deal with its own affairs, for Israelis up until now considered the EU to be just a financial benefactor rather that a strong regional power. Javier Solana replied to Sharon that Israel "had to deal with the EU whether he liked it or not". But everything is happening just like the Bible said it would.

He shall honour the God of forces (Daniel 11:38)
He was commissioned to be Secretary General of NATO in 1995. He served on that post during the conflict in Bosnia. He was the only NATO Secretary General who had the power to decide when and where to bomb. Some accuse him of turning NATO - a purely defence organization into an Atlantic attack force, when he sent bombers to break up Yugoslavia using depleted-Uranium shells.

Javier Solana was responsible for brokering an agreement with Russia over the future NATO expansion to former Soviet satellite countries, of which Russia previously had great reservations about - NATO being a former cold war adversary. He was given a standing ovation by leaders who though such a deal was impossible. His expansion plan for NATO would see many members added to the club, which now has relations with almost every country in the Northern Hemisphere.

In 1999 he was commissioned to be the Secretary General of the WEU, the European Union's "military arm". He is currently the West's only foreign minister that is capable of deploying troops on the ground.

On July 12th, 2004 he was appointed head of the European Defence Agency, a body which aims to streamline European Defence initiatives.

Quote: "The need to bolster Europe's military capabilities to match our aspirations is more urgent than ever. And so, too, is the need for us to respond better to the challenges facing our defence industries. This Agency can make a huge difference" - Javier Solana, Head of EDA

He is also advocating the implementation of the EU's 2010 Headline Goal, effectively a military response group which can be deployed in the event of an emergency.

Quote: "4. The ability for the EU to deploy force packages at high readiness as a response to a crisis either as a stand-alone force or as part of a larger operation enabling follow-on phases, is a key element of the 2010 Headline Goal. These minimum force packages must be military effective, credible and coherent and should be broadly based on the Battlegroups concept. This constitutes a specific form of rapid response, and includes a combined arms battalion sized force package with Combat Support and Combat Service Support. Rapid reaction calls for rapid decision making and planning as well as rapid deployment of forces. On decision making, the ambition of the EU is to be able to take the decision to launch an operation within 5 days of the approval of the Crisis Management Concept by the Council. On the deployment of forces, the ambition is that the forces start implementing their mission on the ground, no later than 10 days after the EU decision to launch the operation. Relevant air and naval capabilities would be included. The need for reserve forces should be taken into account

The timing of the formation of this Rapid Response Force also significant. This initiative will be being completed just as the European Neighbourhood Policy will be reaching its mid-term review. Europe will therefore have a force capable of being deployed anywhere in world within 5-10 days, should any particular country decide to step out of line. This is especially significant if the European Neighbourhood Policy does end up being the fulfilment of Daniel 9:27. Because we know that the Antichrist does deploy a force in the Middle East, in response to a crisis there...

Daniel 11:41-44
He (Antichrist) shall enter also into the glorious land (Israel), and many countries shall be overthrown: but these shall escape out of his hand, even Edom, and Moab, and the chief of the children of Ammon (all Jordan). He shall stretch forth his hand also upon the countries: and the land of Egypt shall not escape. But he shall have power over the treasures of gold and of silver, and over all the precious things of Egypt: and the Libyans and the Ethiopians shall be at his steps. But tidings out of the east and out of the north shall trouble him: therefore he shall go forth with great fury to destroy, and utterly to make away many.

European countries are also working towards the goal of implementing the GMES (Global Monitoring of Environment and Security), a network of satellites that will provide Europe with a "Spy in the Sky". The prime aim of the GMES is to provide security to European borders. It will also ensure member states are complying with EU regulations, such as the common agricultural and fisheries policies.

Quote: "Reviewing the various user needs, it was established that GMES has to support the following EU objectives and policy domains:

* Europe's environmental commitments, within EU territory and globally, by contributing to the formulation, implementation and verification of the Community environmental policies, national regulations and international conventions;
* Other EU policy areas such as agriculture, regional development, fisheries, transport, external relations with respect to the integration of the environmental dimension in the respective domains and their specific requirements;
* Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), including the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP);
* Other policies relevant to European citizens' security at Community and national levels, notably the potential exists for application to policies related to Justice and Home Affairs activities of the European Union, such as border surveillance.

The pilot stage of the project was officially launched on the 15th of November, and is expected to be completed by around 2010. If Europe intends to have its own army which will capable of being launched to deal with any "situation" in the world within 5-10 days, it will have to have a fast, efficient communication system, and the GMES fills this role.

He shall not regard the God of his fathers (Daniel 11:37)
His parents may be Jewish. I haven't hard proof of this yet, but I read this on another website. His grandfather, Salvador de Madariaga, who worked for European unity in the League of Nations authored a book on the history of the Jews in Spain, and also wrote a book about Christopher Columbus, exploring the possibility he was a crypto-Jew.

He shall not regard the desire of women (Daniel 11:37)
Some scholars see the desire of women meaning the desire to "give birth to the Messiah". In any case, Javier Solana has a wife and two children, but lives on his own in Brussels since taking the post of NATO Secretary General in 1995.

By his policy he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand (Daniel 8:25)
He has devised, and is responsible for the implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP). The ENP gives financial incentives to states in exchange for political reforms (read "political control"). It has been said that while America's tool for bringing about global security is its army, Europe's weapon is its financial clout, used through subtle means, i.e. "craft". Statecraft is one of the things Javier Solana says he has used to help bring Europe together.

He shall confirm a covenant with many nations for 7 years, and break it in the middle of those years (Daniel 9:27)
His European Neighbourhood Policy, is to last from 2007-2013, with a mid-term review period, in which Javier Solana himself will be involved. 16 nations have signed up, including Israel and the Palestinian Authority. Israel signed up in December 2004. All countries will have their agreements confirmed on January 1st, 2007. It's prime aim is to bring security and political control to Europe's borders as mentioned above.

Quote: "The (European) Commission will draw up periodic reports on progress and on areas requiring further efforts, taking into account assessments made by the authorities of the partner country. The Action Plans will be reviewed and may be adapted in the light of progress towards meeting the priorities for action. It is suggested that a "mid-term" report be prepared by the Commission, with the contribution of the High Representative on issues related to political co-operation and the CFSP, within two years of the approval of an action plan and a further report within three years. These reports can serve as a basis for the Council to decide the next step in contractual links with each partner country. These could take the form of European Neighbourhood Agreements whose scope will be defined in the light of progress in meeting the priorities set out in the Action Plans.

Just before the 10th Anniversary (27-28th November 2005) of the Barcelona Process - also known as EuroMed, Javier Solana commented on the progress made so far by Europe in the Middle East region. EuroMed itself is a framework of agreements between the European Union and 10 Middle Eastern nations. These are Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, the Palestinian Authority, Syria, Tunisia and Turkey. EuroMed is not a peace process in itself, but aims to resolve regional conflicts at the same time as providing political and economic reforms, helping to bring about stability. It was born out of the Oslo agreement between Israel and the Palestinians, and is thought of more as a means of supporting any real peace agreement that may come about in the future. Javier Solana states that the EU is planning to launch a "governance facility" (perhaps the ENP?) with Mediterranean countries. This will provide economic assistance for those states doing their best to bring about political and economic reforms (or "political control" from Europe). Just like the Middle East covenant that will be confirmed by the Antichrist in the book of Daniel, this "governance facility" is to last for seven years - by Javier's own admission.

Quote: "Many Mediterranean countries say they want to advance on the path of political reform but that it should be home-grown and that they need help. I agree. So I am pleased that the EU will launch a so-called governance facility. This will not be a cosmetic initiative, but one that, over seven years, will offer several hundred million euros to those countries that are making the greatest efforts concerning governance reform. They can then spend the extra money on the priorities they have set themselves. This is what I call a true partnership for political reform.

He shall be the prince of the people that destroyed Jerusalem (Daniel 9:26)
Daniel states that the Antichrist would be the prince of the people that would destroy the city (Jerusalem) and the sanctuary (the Temple). In AD 70, Jerusalem and the Temple were literally destroyed by the Roman armies under the command of Titus. The Antichrist will therefore be a prince of the Revived Roman Empire, or in modern terms, "Europe".

Javier Solana is the High Representative of the EU, and Secretary General of the WEU. These are possibly the highest posts currently achievable in both organizations, and Javier Solana has them both. In that sense Javier Solana is a "prince" or literally a ruler, and not a "king", i.e. he has no kingdom as such. Compare this with Daniel 7:24, which states the ten horns are ten "kings" which shall arise.

That fact that Javier Solana is Spanish may tie in with another Scripture. According to Daniel, Spain may be a significant player in the EU. Daniel 7:24 states, "And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them...". After the ten kings arise, another arises after them. Spain happens to be the 11th member of the European Union (i.e. it arose after the 10). The fact that the Secretary General of the WEU, and High Representative for the CFSP for the EU, and would-be EU Foreign Minister happens to be Spanish is therefore quite significant. And when you consider that Spain also hosts the Barcelona Process, which aims to bring about peace in the Middle East, is currently calling for a global "alliance of civilizations", and Javier Solana is responsible for a seven year covenant with many nations (The European Neighbourhood Policy) adds to the significance of this statement.

He will head a 10 nation federation (Daniel 7:24)
He is Secretary General of the WEU, the military arm of the EU, and comprises the 10 original member states that signed the Treaty of Brussels. These are the only nations of the WEU that have official member status. Other nations have different statuses within the WEU as described in detail below.

He will be of a kingdom that will engulf the whole world (Daniel 7:23)
Although Javier Solana is High Representative of the WEU, only a 10 nation federation the tentacles of the WEU and the EU continue to spread throughout the world.

Of the WEU, there are 10 full members (Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Luxemburg, Portugal, Spain, The Netherlands, United Kingdom), there are 8 affiliate members (Czech republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovak republic, Slovenia), 3 associate members (Iceland, Norway, Turkey), 2 affiliate associate members (Bulgaria, Romania), 5 observers (Austria, Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Sweden), 2 affiliate observers (Cyprus, Malta), 1 affiliate associate partner (Croatia), 2 permanent guests (Russia, Ukraine) and 4 special guests (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, FYROM or Macedonia, Serbia and Montenegro). That makes the WEU a possible alliance of 37 nations.

There are now 25 nations involved in the EU with currently 4 awaiting application for membership, and the European Neighbourhood Policy will directly influence the politics of another 16 nations outside Europe. Russia is being brought closer to Europe, along with all her Soviet satellites states, as was seen in the recent elections in the Ukraine, in which a pro-European President, Victor Yuschenko was elected after a political dispute with a Kremlin backed leader.

He will be of a kingdom that is divided, partly strong and partly weak, and shall not cleave to each other (Daniel 2:41-43)
It's easy to see how Europe is a Revived Roman Empire that is "divided". The very fact there is a WEU of 10 official members and a broader EU of 25 members shows a Europe is still divided. The WEU, under the direction of Javier Solana, was meant to transfer its powers to the EU, but this never happened. It seems instead that the WEU has taken on a new role as being the new military arm of the European Union.
For "partly strong and partly weak", the WEU nations are mainly wealthy and politically strong, while the new members of the EU are generally poor and politically weak and unstable.
And the fact that the nations "will not cleave to one another" has been played out before all our eyes in the Iraq war, the problems of ratifying of the EU Constitution, amid other disagreements which seem to come up from time to time.

He will subdue 3 of those nations (Daniel 7:24)
Britain, France and Germany (officially called the E3) have apparently been jockeying for position to hold the lion's share of foreign policy until such times that the EU Constitution is ratified and comes into force. This ambition has been brought to light by the E3's recent dealings with Iran's nuclear programme. The EU Constitution will create the official position of EU Foreign Secretary, which Javier Solana, the EU High Representative currently holds in an unofficial capacity. These three nations would need to be "subdued" in order to give Javier Solana a clear shot at being the "one voice of Europe".

He will grow great towards the East and the South (Daniel 8:9)
Javier Solana's European Neighbourhood Policy is aimed at developing relations with Middle Eastern and Caucus Nations, directly towards the East and the South of the European Union Bloc.

Daniel 8:9-11
And out of one of them came forth a little horn (Antichrist), which waxed exceeding great, toward the south, and toward the east, and toward the pleasant [land] (Israel). And it waxed great, [even] to the host of heaven; and it cast down [some] of the host and of the stars to the ground, and stamped upon them. Yea, he magnified [himself] even to the prince of the host (he became the chief of the EU army), and by him the daily [sacrifice] was taken away, and the place of his sanctuary was cast down (Temple).

Quote: Javier Solana - "The European Neighbourhood Policy is not a policy aimed at EU enlargement; it neither foresees it nor excludes it. The policy is in the first place aimed at developing closer relations between the European Union and its new neighbours to the East and the South, making them benefit as much as possible from their proximity to the EU. There is so much work to be done and there are so many opportunities to co-operate more effectively in the fields of trade, reforms, in fighting terrorism, crime and corruption, in working more closely together in foreign and security policy that there is no real reason at this stage to think about what might happen in the longer term.

His number is Six hundred threescore and six (666 - Revelation 13:18)
His position as High Representative of the WEU is linked in two places with the number 666 in official EU documents.
The first document issued in 1998 by the European commission was called Article 666, and which called for the immediate election of a High Representative for the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy who would have a "strong political profile", and be backed by "credible operational capabilities".
The second document, called "Recommendation 666" which was drafted by Javier Solana himself, called for special powers to be given to the High Representative, enabling him to take control of political and military councils in the event of an emergency.

Quote: "12) Support proposals for the WEU Secretary-General and CFSP High Representative to preside over the PSC (Political and Security Committee) and civilian crisis-management machinery and give him powers to convene the Council of the European Union in the event of an emergency;

New World Order
Javier Solana is also a member of the Club of Rome, and frequently speaks at the Council on Foreign Relations. He is therefore an advocate and participant in the New World Order.
Miki
I noticed the lack of notoriety by the press as well.

Maybe they think the ignorant masses need not concern themselves with all this diplomatic intelligence.
Gavrial
[quote=Dove,Nov 28 2005, 01:57 AM]

ARE WE LOOKING FOR THE AC IN ALL THE WRONG PLACES
And forgetting Daniel 8:5-9

http://www.clintonglobalinitiative.org/home.nsf/pt_home Let God’s wisdom of Revelation 17:9-10 and Daniels latter day prophecy of the “king of Greece’ (Daniel 8:21) who has sat under the goddess Athena, who "sits" on our Capitol dome, open our minds to all truth, Amein.

I believe the 10 kings of Daniel 7 and Revelation 13 began their count in 1960-61 when JFK was elected and sworn in as President of the US. Then some 32 years later, in 1992-93, the “coming 11th”, the “subduer” of the LAST THREE in Daniel 7:24, came through the “back door” of Bill Clintons presidency!

The “back door” quote above is from http://members.aol.com/chursey/c_alan_mart...ouse_vision.htm a fascinating TWICE VISITED ACCOUNT SEPERATED BY 24 YEARS that sets a timeline for our coming Lord and Savior.

House 10 Clinton: (1993-2001)

It is this administration that is the main focus of the vision of the night. Over the house was a very dark cloud, SO DARK THAT IT SEEMED LIKE NIGHT. The cloud was very low so as to almost touch the rooftop. There was something VERY SIGNIFICANT about the "back door" of this house that may have some meaning. The lights were on in the house and they stood out brightly in the darkness created by the cloud.

This above paragraph GIVES LITTLE DOUBT as to what country the antichrist is coming out of, with Daniel 8:8-9 GIVING US THE DETAILS!

I do not believe the “subjugator/antichrist” will be a “resurrected super man” however Daniel 11 shows he may have military expertise? Daniel 7:20 says he is in a very unique position of power, in that “before him three fall” with verse 7:24 telling us he “subdues these three kings” and I believe has been for the past 13+ years!

His seat today is located in the Masonic “house of the temple” in Washington, where I believe he is in direct contact with the “prince and power of the air”, Satan himself. It is, by virtue of Masonic history a good place for “dark forces” from all walks of life to conduct business. It is from there he sits, not daily, but when he is given direction as to what policies and schemes he will dictate to his “subdued kings” who are before him.

LET US NOT FORGET DANIEL 8:5-9

Daniel 8:5 And as I was considering, behold, an he goat came from the west on the face of the whole earth (Bush Sr’s ‘Desert Storm’ campaign), and touched not the ground: and the goat had a NOTABLE HORN between his eyes (Bush Sr. is one of the ‘ten kings’ of Daniel 7 and Revelation 13) between his eyes. 6 And he came to the ram that had two horns, which I had seen standing before the river, and ran unto him in the fury of his power. 7 And I saw him come close unto the ram, and he was moved with choler against him, and smote the ram, and brake his two horns: and there was no power in the ram to stand before him, but he cast him down to the ground, and stamped upon him: and there was none that could deliver the ram out of his hand. 8 Therefore the he goat waxed very great: and when he was strong, the great horn was broken (not reelected); and for it came up four notable ones (Clinton-Gore and Bush-Cheney) toward the four winds of heaven. 9 And OUT OF ONE OF THEM came forth a little horn, which waxed exceeding great, toward the south, and toward the east, and toward the pleasant land.

Giving Him the glory, a Ezekiel 33:6 watching one, REPENT the Kingdom of God is at hand, make your election SURE
Zephaniah
Please note before reading. I am not saying Javier Solana is the Antichrist.. But he seems to come close, i think he could be a Decoy & You have alot of good points Gavrial
Leia
QUOTE(Dove @ Nov 28 2005, 12:57 AM)
His number is Six hundred threescore and six (666 - Revelation 13:18)
His position as High Representative of the WEU is linked in two places with the number 666 in official EU documents.
The first document issued in 1998 by the European commission was called Article 666, and which called for the immediate election of a High Representative for the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy who would have a "strong political profile", and be backed by "credible operational capabilities".
The second document, called "Recommendation 666" which was drafted by Javier Solana himself, called for special powers to be given to the High Representative, enabling him to take control of political and military councils in the event of an emergency.

[right][snapback]25636[/snapback][/right]



Do these people ot read scripture or are they really just that bold?

leia
Zephaniah
QUOTE(Leia @ Nov 28 2005, 05:49 PM)
QUOTE(Dove @ Nov 28 2005, 12:57 AM)

His number is Six hundred threescore and six (666 - Revelation 13:18)
His position as High Representative of the WEU is linked in two places with the number 666 in official EU documents.
The first document issued in 1998 by the European commission was called Article 666, and which called for the immediate election of a High Representative for the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy who would have a "strong political profile", and be backed by "credible operational capabilities".
The second document, called "Recommendation 666" which was drafted by Javier Solana himself, called for special powers to be given to the High Representative, enabling him to take control of political and military councils in the event of an emergency.

[right][snapback]25636[/snapback][/right]



Do these people ot read scripture or are they really just that bold?

leia
[right][snapback]25723[/snapback][/right]



What do you mean as in bold? Sorry, i forgot to post the link to what was said above.

http://www.evenmore.co.uk/prophecy/antichrist.html
Zephaniah
QUOTE
Big-name absentees and deadlock over terrorism mar EuroMed summit
Blair and Durão Barroso praise EU role in new Middle East border dealA thousand protesters vent their fury against the neoliberal drift of the regional partnership

El Pais Spain | JAMES BADCOCK
Barcelona

The Euromediterranean Summit, being held in Barcelona to mark the tenth anniversary of the partnership between the European Union and southern Mediterranean nations, was in danger Sunday of becoming a one-way dialogue following the withdrawal of several Arab heads of state ahead of today's closing session.

Current EU president, British Prime Minister Tony Blair, nevertheless made a firm defense yesterday of European foreign policy, citing the recent agreement with Israel and Palestine over the Rafah border crossing from Gaza into Egypt as evidence of Europe's effectiveness.

Speaking after a meeting with Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas and European Commission President José Manuel Durão Barroso, Blair congratulated all parties on the Rafah agreements, saying it was "part of a process agreed with by the overwhelming majority of the international community." Noting that peace in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was a "strategic objective" of the EU, Blair said the border opening was a "step toward a two-state solution."

Durão Barroso went further, claiming that the Rafah deal, under which European forces will guarantee security at the crossing, was an "historic achievement for the EU." Palestinian President Abbas thanked both the EU and US for help in the negotiations, recognizing that it was now the Palestinian Authority's "duty to achieve stability" in the region.

But the Middle East conflict has already cast a huge shadow over the summit, and jeopardized a proposed deal on anti-terrorist cooperation. Arab diplomats have urged that the right to resist occupation be recognized - a clear reference to Israel and the Palestinian territories - while the official EU line stipulates that terrorist attacks cannot ever be justified.

Even when it had a "sense of injustice" as its source, Blair insisted that it "was not a root to

solution, but an obstacle to it." He praised Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero's Alliance of Civilizations as proof that the EU has a "political role in bringing together Europe and the Muslim world."

Many Arab leaders are nevertheless staying away from Barcelona. The latest casualty was Algerian President Abdelaziz Bouteflika, who on Saturday night was taken to Paris for tests after experiencing gastric problems. Bouteflika's absence added to that of Egyptian president, Hosni Mubarak, King Abdullah of Jordan, Bashar al-Assad and Moroccan King Mohammed VI, besides Israel's Ariel Sharon. The attendance of Tunisian President Ben Ali was described by summit organizers as "highly doubtful."Sunday saw Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero busily shoring up support for the summit's final declaration in a series of bilateral meetings with fellow European heads of state, hours after overseeing the launch of his UN-backed Alliance of Civilizations initiative, which held its first high-level meeting of 20 experts in Palma, Majorca, yesterday (see story this page).

Last week in Congress, Zapatero had said that that today's final declaration and the five-year Euromed action plan "will confirm and deepen the political and economic commitments laid down in the 1995 declaration."

The main aims of the Barcelona summit are to extend agreement between the EU, its candidate countries, and the nine southern Mediterranean affiliates in the fields of security and immigration, following a decade of efforts to bolster economic and cultural cooperation initiated by the so-called Barcelona Process. Libya and Mauritania are also in attendance as observers of the Euromed project.

But with intra-regional trade in the southern Mediterranean region at just 15 percent of GDP, the lowest such rate in any comparable bloc of neighboring countries according to the European Commission, the no-show of so many Arab leaders is doubly disappointing.

The original Barcelona declaration called for a free-trade area encompassing the EU countries and the southern Mediterranean bloc, though progress so far has largely been made on a bilateral basis - such as the partnership accords with Morocco and Egypt, due to guarantee free trade by 2010. King Mohammed VI was yesterday on an official visit to Japan, leaving his prime minister, Driss Jettou, to represent Morocco at the Euromed summit.

Under the EU's MEDA development fund to the southern region, €11.75 billion has been invested since 1995, besides a further €11 billion in European Investment Bank loans.

On Saturday, the EU also announced it would be setting up a new program to boost freedom of expression and the media across the southern Mediterranean. Part of the plan is to create "lobbies" of journalists from both shores to act as watchdogs on the freedom of the press and audiovisual media in the region.

"Mediterranean of capital"
Outside the heavily-guarded Forum complex, meanwhile, up to 1,000 demonstrators took to the surrounding streets in the Catalan capital to protest against the meeting's objectives. Carrying banners which read "No to a Mediterranean of capital and war," the protesters were critical of what they consider the neoliberal slant of EU policies in the region. "They are perpetuating current injustices, such as the wall of shame in Palestine or those in Ceuta and Melilla; injustices which generate more violence," one of the demonstration's organizers said. "Over the last 10 years, the social and economic situation has deteriorated considerably, and we hope that we don't have to meet up here again in 10 years' time with an even worse situation," she added.


QUOTE
Euromed Summit Ends with Anti-Terror 'Code'
Großansicht des Bildes mit der Bildunterschrift:  Writing on the wall: An illuminated backdrop listed the summit's aims
The EU and its mostly Muslim southern neighbors agreed to a watered down "joint code of conduct" against terrorism, ending a lackluster summit in Barcelona.

The European Union signed a last-minute agreement with its partners from the Mediterranean rim on a joint code of conduct to fight terrorism. But clear tensions remained after a summit clouded by the absence of most Arab leaders.


Discord over the definition of terrorism marked the two-day
gathering, which was portrayed by the European Union as a bid to revitalize a 10-year-old partnership with its southern neighbors.




Bildunterschrift: Großansicht des Bildes mit der Bildunterschrift:  Most EU leaders attended, while Arab heads of state gave it a miss
Debates over what constitutes terrorism, and the Israel/Palestinian question, raged late into the night on Sunday and were taken up again Monday morning.



'Definitions will run their course'



In the end, an agreement was struck only after a compromise omitted both the EU's insistence that self-determination could not be used to justify terrorism, and the Arabs' demand to distinguish between terrorism and the right to resist foreign occupation.



"It's as strong a statement as you can possibly have on the
unified determination to fight terrorism in all its forms,"
said British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who co-chaired the two-day summit in Barcelona.



Blair hailed the code of conduct, saying "terrorism can never be justified. ...This is a very important moment both for the European countries and for our other colleagues around the table."



He added: "Definitional issues will run their course."




Israel-Palestine issue unresolved



The summit also resulted in a raft of initiatives to combat
illegal immigration, while fostering legal migration flows as a
means of allowing wealth to flow from north to south.


But the leaders were unable to agree on a planned common
vision document because of differences over what to say about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Instead the presidency issued a statement calling for a just, two-state solution.




The summit was clouded by the pointed absence of most Arab leaders. While most European Union heads of state attended, all but two of the ten Middle East group members only sent ministerial-level delegates.



Tensions bubbled over late Sunday when an Algerian minister lashed out at EU demands for reform in exchange for more money.




Bildunterschrift: Großansicht des Bildes mit der Bildunterschrift:  Algeria's Belkhadem (left) and Italy's Frattini (right) met at the Euromed 2004"We find it humiliating that the Europeans demand reforms from us in exchange for a few euros," said Abdelaziz Belkhadem as the summit opened to mark the 10th anniverary of the so-called Euro-Mediterranean partnership.



Merkel meets Turkey's Erdogan



The summit set the stage for a first meeting between Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and new German Chancellor Angela Merkel. She accepted an invitation to visit Turkey and pledged to respect commitments made to Ankara on EU accession talks, despite her own doubts about Turkey's EU bid.



Without commenting herself on Turkey's aim to join the union, Merkel made it clear that the talks begun in October would continue.



"We talked about 'pacta sunt servanda' (pacts are made to be obeyed) and we expect positive developments," she said.



"The atmosphere was good and it was always good between us," she added. Erdogan said he would visit Germany following Merkel's planned trip to Turkey in 2006.




Bildunterschrift: Großansicht des Bildes mit der Bildunterschrift:  Euromed logoThe Euromed partnership brings together the 25-nation EU with Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, the Palestinian Authority, Syria, Tunisia and Turkey.



The summit was meant to be the first time leaders of a group that includes Israelis and Palestinians as well as the 25 EU countries had met. Yet of the 10 Mediterranean-rim partner states, only Turkey and the Palestinian Authority sent their heads of state.
Zephaniah
More from herb ->

QUOTE
World "Governance"
There's an old saying that you can bring a horse to water, but not make a horse drink. That's the way I feel about the way some are handling the recent news. In fact, it astonishes me sometimes how people can find a way to evade the apparent.

Before I get into the recent news, let's back up a bit. Let's look at the whole picture.

In 1948, Israel was reborn as a nation. Was this a sign of Christ's return? Some would say it wasn't, because there are no signs associated with Christ's return. It's just going to -- boom -- happen. I think it was a sign -- a big one.

Then, in 1950, with the Shuman Declaration, the old Roman Empire began to revive. Some would say this was a sign of Christ's return. Other would say it wasn't.

In 1995, the Western European Union became an alliance of 10 nations. Some would say this was a sign of Christ's return. Others would say it wasn't.

On November 19, 1995, a man by the name of Javier Solana became the Secretary General of the 10-nation alliance. Just the month before, he became Secretary General of the Council of the European Union, and the first High Representative of the EU's common foreign and security policy. These new offices -- both in the 10-nation alliance and in the EU -- are directly connected with the number 666. Some would say this was a sign of Christ's return. Others would say it wasn't.

Now, for the recent news. It turns out that this same individual, Javier Solana, is engaged in confirming, or making strong, an existing covenant with many -- his 1995 Euro-Mediterranean Partnership for Peace. And, if he is still in charge of the EU's foreign policy on January 1, 2007, he will be confirming it for a period of seven years Read about it here  I  And here.

If you've read the two articles, you might have noticed the term, "governance." This is Club of Rome talk. Internationalists don't talk so much anymore about creating a world government. They talk about a thing called "world governance." The idea is, instead of establishing a global federalization of some kind, they want to link existing governments, along with all the private sectors, into a new global ethic. In other words, they want to talk everybody into going along with their global agenda willingly.

You know why this is scary? Because, it means we may be much farther along than we think. While we Christians are waiting around for a world government, world governance may already be upon us. I don't know about you, but I find that idea really scary.

What does this all mean? It means, if we're not believers and followers of Jesus Christ, we had better become such. It means setting aside our sins and getting serious about the time.

Friends, we may not have much of it.
choirgirl
Maybe I am merely a simpleton, but I can't for the life of me figure out what Gavrial is saying...who does he think the AC is? Clinton or GW? Or someone else? These are fascinating times in which to be a believer!
Gavrial
choirgirl, on Nov 28 2005, at 05:50 PM asked,

Maybe I am merely a simpleton, but I can't for the life of me figure out what Gavrial is saying...who does he think the AC is? Clinton or GW? Or someone else? These are fascinating times in which to be a believer!

Hi 'choirgirl' Here's A CLUE from Daniel 8:8 Therefore the he goat waxed very great: and when he was strong, the great horn was broken (Bush Sr. was not reelected); and for it came up four notable ones (Clinton-Gore and Bush-Cheney) toward the four winds of heaven.

Now the 'punch line' from Daniel 8:9 And OUT OF ONE OF THEM came forth a little horn, which waxed exceeding great, toward the south, and toward the east, and toward the pleasant land.

Thank you for your question and may the Lord bless you and keep you, Gavrial

Giving Him the glory, a Ezekiel 33:6 watching one, REPENT the Kingdom of God is at hand, make your election SURE
Leia
QUOTE(Dove @ Nov 28 2005, 11:59 AM)
But the Middle East conflict has already cast a huge shadow over the summit, and jeopardized a proposed deal on anti-terrorist cooperation. Arab diplomats have urged that the right to resist occupation be recognized - a clear reference to Israel and the Palestinian territories - while the official EU line stipulates that terrorist attacks cannot ever be justified.


'Definitions will run their course'



[right][snapback]25727[/snapback][/right]



Ya know....The definitional difference in "the right to resist occupation" and "terrorist attacks" should prove very interesting!

leia
Zephaniah
QUOTE
EU's Solana hails Euromed summit as 'great success'

BARCELONA - EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana on Monday hailed a two-day meeting with the bloc's southern neighbours as a "great success," despite several Arab no-shows and strains over terrorism.
"Yesterday people thought it would be a failure. Today they can see that it's a great success that we unanimously adopted two important documents, on terrorism and a five-year plan," he told AFP.

The two-day meeting ended Monday with agreement on a Code of Conduct on countering terrorism, and a five-year work programme including measures to promote legal migration and clamp down on illegal immigrants.

The anti-terror pact was "very, very significant," Solana said, adding that "all the (Euromed) countries have suffered" from terrorist attacks in recent years.

Solana played down the fact that the 35 governments participating -- the 25 EU states plus 10 Mediterranean-rim partners from Morocco to Turkey -- had been unable to agree a formal joint declaration.

The results of the summit were released in the form of a chairman's statement after Israel objected to proposed wording about a resolution of its conflict with the Palestinians.

"There has never been a joint declaration at Euromed meetings," said Solana, while also underlining that the Barcelona meeting was the first such summit since the Euro-Mediterranean partnership was launched in 1995.

The summit atmosphere was clouded by the fact that only two of Europe's 10 partner countries were represented at the top level, in the form of Palestinian chief Mahmud Abbas and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?id=81310


QUOTE
Javier Solana: EU and Ukraine should not be running ahead of themselves in advancing relations

EU High Representative Javier Solana ahead of the Ukraine-EU summit shared his thoughts about the prospects of Ukraine-EU relations, Ukraine's admission to WTO and also the solution of the problem of Transdniestria in an interview with Interfax-Ukraine and Ukrinform agencies.

Mr. Solana, are you satisfied with the current state of play in relations between EU and Ukraine? What progress do you expect to be achieved on the Summit?

- Relations between the EU and Ukraine continue to deepen. 2005 has been a good year in this regard. The Summit is a good opportunity to take stock of our relationship. You will see positive messages coming out of it.

You and other European politicians for many times mentioned that the question on the Ukrainian membership is out of European political agenda, in other words, "everything but membership". Could this position be evaluated in a future?

- The EU - Ukraine partnership is deepening. This is a common effort, and we have a shared understanding on what needs to be done now. We should not waste time speculating on the distant future when there is so much work for us all to do now. Both Ukraine and the EU are on the move. Both are developing and changing. I have said many times that the quality of our relationship and its development is directly linked to the quality of Ukraine's democracy and reforms. The EU - Ukraine Action Plan is an agenda for reform and EU support for it. Its implementation needs to be our shared priority. Together, we must construct a new reality built on a foundation of many, smaller and irreversible successes. The strength of that foundation will determine our relationship. Let us just not run ahead of ourselves.

Ukrainian side clearly wishes to replace Partnership Cooperation Agreement ending on January 1 2008, by "the New Enhanced Agreement". From your point of view, is Ukraine ready for such modification and could such a new Agreement foresee a perspective for joining European Communities?

- Work towards a new enhanced agreement is a key priority for us both. We all realize the benefits of our relationship and the need to deepen it. The shape and scope of the agreement will depend on progress made in the fulfillment of the objectives of the Action Plan. We will jointly start evaluating progress next year, and this process will then lead to looking more closely at a new agreement.

It looks like Ukraine will not be ready to join WTO by the end of the year. How this situation could impact on EU-Ukraine relations, in particular, on a character of the future bilateral Agreement and on negotiations of the Common Trade Area?

- As you know, the EU has been very supportive of Ukraine's WTO membership. You already have the necessary bilateral protocol with the EU. In order to attain membership, you need to make some changes to your laws, and I hope that the Rada will vote on these soon.

I have already described above what kinds of things can affect the new enhanced agreement. As regards a Free Trade Agreement, a feasibility study is already under way, and this will facilitate the launch of negotiations once Ukraine has achieved WTO membership.

Some EU countries, for instance, Poland and Baltic States, are critical on the Russia-German project on the Northern Pipeline. Do you share their belief that such pipeline could be used by Russia as a tool of political pressure on neighboring countries?

- Energy is a key element of the EU - Russia relationship, and as such also has political aspects. But in the end, the construction of a new pipeline is a business decision. It would be far too expensive a project to be undertaken for political purposes. The energy relationship between the EU and Russia will increase in importance and volume. I feel sure that all existing pipelines - in addition to those planned and under construction - will be needed also in the future, and that we will not have a situation where alternative routes can be used for political purposes.

I also wish to point out that there has been significant progress in the field of energy co-operation between the EU and Ukraine. At the Summit, we will sign a MoU on energy co-operation, with the aim of progressive integration of the Ukrainian and EU energy markets and the enhancement of energy security.

EU succeeds in negotiations with Russia on the "Four Common Spaces", one of these foresees "shared responsibility for common neighborhood". What does it mean for the countries mentioned? What influence could Russia have on EU-Ukraine partnership?

- Ukraine is a neighbor of strategic importance to the EU and a key regional player. We talk a lot with each other about developments in our common neighborhood, and co-operate closely. We also talk about these same countries with Russia.

Those countries of the former Soviet Union which are in the common neighborhood of both the EU and Russia are of key importance for the future of Europe. Both have an interest in the stable development of this region. Both the EU and Russia play a role here and their actions influence developments. Both need to act responsibly.

What has changed is that we are all moving away from thinking in terms of "zero-sum games". An era of "spheres of influence" has gone, to be replaced by an era of co-operation that recognizes the sovereignty of the countries in our common neighborhood. We hope to see these countries become strong and stable democracies, making their own responsible choices. This is the context in which we discuss this region with our partners, including with Russia.

From your point of view, how effective is existing format of Transdniestria settlement? What new element could be brought by EU and US joining in to negotiations? What is EU position on the Russian troops withdrawal from the region and its demilitarization?

- I am pleased that the EU is now an observer at the settlement talks. The first meeting took place in late October, and the EU could fully participate in the discussions and play a role. Enlargement of the format brings in two leading global actors. The EU wants to work constructively towards a viable settlement, and looks forward to working in a constructive manner to this end.

As to Russian troops in Transdniestria. As you know, the EU has repeatedly called for the implementation of the so-called Istanbul commitments, calling for the withdrawal of Russian ammunition and troops from the region.

As concerns Russian peacekeepers - there are calls for possible adjustments in the peacekeeping format. We will have to see what works and at what stage of the settlement process possible changes should be made. I could imagine that the EU could co-operate with Russia in finding the right format.

OSCE currently propose to monitor the Transdniestria's defense industry enterprises to stop possible smuggling from the area of conventional weapons. Do you support such proposals and have your confirmed information on the facts of such smuggling, along with such involving human, drugs and goods trafficking?

- In the same way as our engagement on the border is a confidence-building measure, so would the proposed monitoring of the Transdniestrian military-industrial complex. There was some movement on this issue at the last round of settlement talks - attended by the EU and the US. I warmly welcome this movement, and support the idea of monitoring.

As regards allegations of smuggling, I am aware of these, but would rather not comment before our border mission has been on the ground for a while. Ukraine and Moldova have made a political commitment to address this issue, and the EU has come here, at the joint invitation of both countries, to help.

How EU is going to react and to do if parliamentary elections in Transdniestria scheduled for December this year will be not recognized by international community, but will bring "legacy" to self-proclaimed institutions?

- The Ukrainian settlement plan for Transdniestria builds on the idea of democratic elections to the Transdniestrian Supreme Soviet. The precondition for such elections are not there yet. There is hope of an assessment mission being deployed to evaluate what would be needed for internationally organized free and fair elections. Ukraine deserves credit for raising the importance of the democratization of Transdniestria as an element in a viable settlement.

While we cannot expect overnight democratization, the settlement process should not be held hostage by any given future event. We need to see where movement towards a settlement can be realistically found. If an opportunity arises, it needs to be seized.

How could Ukraine be deeper involved in EU security policy? In particular, are there any possible forms of Ukrainian participation in EU military arrangements?

- One of this year's great success stories is the strengthening of the EU - Ukraine partnership in the field of foreign and security policy. Since the spring there has been a notable convergence of the foreign policy positions and statements of the EU and Ukraine. We have also signed agreements on the exchange of classified information and participation in EU operations. While Ukraine has already sent participants to some EU civilian crisis management operations, the latter agreement will increase our opportunities to work together in the field.

In addition, the EU has decided to give concrete support to Ukraine's efforts in destroying its Small Arms and Light Weapons and their ammunition stockpiles. I also wish to use this opportunity to welcome ratification by the Rada -- on 16 November -- of an Additional Protocol to the Non-proliferation treaty, something which demonstrates the commonality of values between us.

At least as important are the increased formal and informal contacts between the EU and Ukraine in the field of foreign affairs. In addition to the growing number of formal fora, we consult much more than earlier on a broad variety of issues. Ukraine and the EU have become close foreign and security policy partners, and this partnership is strengthening.

http://www.interfax.ru/e/B/exclusive/29.ht..._issue=11427525
Zephaniah
Interesting read ->

QUOTE
The Euro-Med Summit and the 'Alliance of Civilizations'
by Michael G. Mickey

(11-28-05)

As this week's Euro-Med Summit approached, I read a commentary by EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana entitled 'Toward a partnership of hope' as many of my site's readers felt certain something dramatic might be forthcoming at the summit where the future fulfillment of Bible prophecy is concerned.

As I read Solana's words concerning the Barcelona process he started ten years ago, also called the Euro-Mediterranean partnership, I was chilled when I read how the Barcelona process was born of the hopes of the Oslo peace talks, which had a seven-year timeline - one I still believe may play a prominent role in the prophetic future. My attention was grabbed even more when I further read that a period of seven years may play largely in the future of the Euro-Med region. In Solana's speech, there were many points worth sharing, but I was fascinated by the following excerpt as it addresses a future period of seven years:

Many Mediterranean countries say they want to advance on the path of political reform but that it should be home-grown and that they need help. I agree. So I am pleased that the EU will launch a so-called governance facility. This will not be a cosmetic initiative, but one that, over seven years, will offer several hundred million euros to those countries that are making the greatest efforts concerning governance reform. They can then spend the extra money on the priorities they have set themselves. This is what I call a true partnership for political reform.

Many believe, as I hear often, the next EU budget period, set for 2007-2013, could be worth noting as a timeframe wherein the EU could make a major move toward establishing a new world order, leaving me to wonder, specifically after reading Solana's words, if the millions of euros he refers to being handed out over seven years is simply coincidence or could indeed be telling of things to come. Time will tell as one of the stated goals of the Euro-Med partnership is peace in the region, particularly resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

And then there's the "Alliance of Civilizations" I'm hearing more about that met on the sidelines of the Euro-Med summit weekend as well, but first some background on that.

In July of 2005, as seen in a United Nations press release, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan announced an "Alliance of Civilizations" would be formed which would come up with a "practical plan of action" by late 2006 - one short year from now. A practical plan to achieve what you ask? The press release gives us a pretty good idea, as seen in the following excerpt:

The Secretary-General is pleased to announce the launch of an initiative for an “Alliance of Civilizations”. The initiative is intended to respond to the need for a committed effort by the international community -- both at the institutional and civil society levels -- to bridge divides and overcome prejudice, misconceptions, misperceptions, and polarization which potentially threaten world peace. The Alliance will aim to address emerging threats emanating from hostile perceptions that foment violence, and to bring about cooperation among various efforts to heal such divisions.
While I'm sure some will scoff at what I'm about to state, I believe the divide the so-called "Alliance of Civilizations" is primarily concerned with is the divide that exists between the Israelis and Palestinians - the one the international community, the international Quartet, and the revived Roman empire believes is "fomenting" the violence most of us refer to as terrorism.

As I've stated on many occasions and, I'm hopeful, demonstrated through a variety of references, the international community is shaking in its collective boots as a result of radical Islamic terrorism and, as a result, has become convinced the only way to prevent or lessen acts of Islamic terror from threatening the western world is for Israel to yield to the demands of its Arab-Muslim enemies and surrender land for peace which Israel is beginning to do, as was seen in the recent Gaza withdrawal.

Well before Kofi Annan was talking up the "Alliance of Civilizations", Spanish prime minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, as seen in a BBC report dated July of 2004, issued what I believe was the initial call for such a group when he asked for "an international effort to resolve cultural and religious differences between the Western and Muslim world" --- what he originally referred to as an "alliance of cultures". What I want my readers to note, particularly, from the 2004 article is the following (emphasis added mine):

The alliance he envisages could therefore prevent hate and misunderstanding from developing by looking at political and cultural issues - everything from joint peace keeping missions to interfaith dialogue.

Did you catch that? Peacekeeping and interfaith dialogue! While I have no idea if Zapatero's proposed "alliance of cultures", which is now being called the "Alliance of Civilizations" by Kofi Annan's U.N., is seen in the Bible, prophecy tells us an alliance of civilizations of some sort is going to take place in the prophetic future --- one that will confirm a seven-year peace in the Middle East between Israel and its enemies (Daniel 9:26-27), as well as impose a universal religion on mankind --- one that will see the peacemaker from the revived Roman empire (today's EU) who will someday confirm peace between Israel and its enemies proclaimed to be "god" three and one-half years later and commanded to be worshipped, as seen in the 13th chapter of Revelation.


A number of world leaders have come out in support of Zapatero's proposed "Alliance of Civilizations" which Annan drew attention to in July of this year. For example, Tony Blair, as seen in a Guardian Unlimited report dated 7-27-05, "welcomed a plan for an "alliance of civilisations" to combat Islamist terrorism by bringing together Christian and Muslim nations." Interesting in light of what prophecy tells us is ultimately going to take place, huh? Can you say ecumenism?

Fox News reported, in the days leading up to the Euro-Med summit, the United Nations had a new "scheme" up its sleeve. The scheme? You guessed it! The Alliance of Civilizations which was to meet for the first time, apparently at sidebar in Spain. Two paragraphs of the Fox News story demonstrate why we may want to keep an eye on this Alliance. They are presented below in the order they appear in the story (emphasis added mine):

Still reeling from scandals on many fronts, the U.N. has launched another questionable initiative, called the Alliance of Civilizations, which is due to hold its first meeting this weekend in Spain. The program has been widely touted by U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan as a bridge across cultural and religious divides, but it involves a daisy-chain of dubious associations that casts serious doubt both on the project itself and on the U.N.’s ability to cut loose from the scandals of the past decade.
But one lane of the bridge is a lot wider than the other: the panel of 18 “eminent persons” whom Annan named to the Alliance (a 19th, representing all of East Asia, has yet to be named) is weighted heavily on the side of Islamic states, including representatives of Egypt, Qatar, Tunisia, Morocco, Pakistan and the former president of Iran, Mohamed Khatami. There are two representatives from the U.S., but none from Israel.

Yes, prophecy tells us there will be a new world order in the prophetic future - one we're told will bridge cultural and religious divides and, ultimately, encompass Jerusalem with forces!

Zechariah 14:2: For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city.


Could what we're seeing, the Alliance of Civilizations, be a start to that coming about? If so, it isn't ultimately going to be what Zapatero and Annan currently think it will be as many of the Islamic states it hopes to have as allies in that cause are going to be doing anything but working toward peace in the prophetic future - the Gog-Magog battle of Ezekiel 38 & 39 being demonstrative of that!

All the same, whether it be Solana's Euro-Med partnership or Zapatero's "Alliance of Civilizations" or some new brainchild the EU is going to come up with, someone, sooner or later, is going to emerge from the EU with a seven-year plan for peace in the Middle East that is going to work! As both of these initiatives demonstrate, the EU has a number of irons in the fire presently. That could, of course, change quickly, but it's interesting to monitor at any rate.

An EUBusiness.com article stresses that the goal of the Euro-Med summit was "to re-invigorate ties with its Mediterranean-rim and Mideast neighbours" and to "set up a free trade area covering both the EU and the Mediterranean." The article also makes reference to the Oslo peace process having played a role in the Euro-Med partnership's hope-filled early stages, noting that things haven't gone as originally planned.

As the article points out, the Middle East has plunged back into violence since 1995, the EU has struggled with constitutional issues, and the Iraq war has taken place. Adding to that, the western world presently suspects (knows, in my opinion) Iran is seeking nuclear weapons, further complicating what seems a difficult, if not impossible, task for anyone to complete --- the task of bringing peace to the Middle East