Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Recalled From Iran Due To 'imminent' U.s. Attack
Christian-Forum.net > Current Events > Signs of the Times
flyingsquirrel

Dutch Spies Recalled From Iran Due to 'Imminent' U.S. Attack
(IsraelNN.com) According to a leading newspaper published in the Netherlands, the Dutch intelligence agency recently recalled operatives from Iran in response to information that a United States attack on the Islamic Republic is "imminent."

see link: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/127444
diverteach
QUOTE (flyingsquirrel @ Sep 2 2008, 02:04 PM) *
Dutch Spies Recalled From Iran Due to 'Imminent' U.S. Attack
(IsraelNN.com) According to a leading newspaper published in the Netherlands, the Dutch intelligence agency recently recalled operatives from Iran in response to information that a United States attack on the Islamic Republic is "imminent."

see link: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/127444


Ain't happening till after the elections.
Gideon7620
QUOTE (diverteach @ Sep 2 2008, 03:35 PM) *
QUOTE (flyingsquirrel @ Sep 2 2008, 02:04 PM) *
Dutch Spies Recalled From Iran Due to 'Imminent' U.S. Attack
(IsraelNN.com) According to a leading newspaper published in the Netherlands, the Dutch intelligence agency recently recalled operatives from Iran in response to information that a United States attack on the Islamic Republic is "imminent."

see link: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/127444


Ain't happening till after the elections.



Seems more logical it would happen before the elections. I just wonder if the US will use a false flag, attack method.
diverteach
QUOTE (Gideon7620 @ Sep 2 2008, 02:55 PM) *
QUOTE (diverteach @ Sep 2 2008, 03:35 PM) *
QUOTE (flyingsquirrel @ Sep 2 2008, 02:04 PM) *
Dutch Spies Recalled From Iran Due to 'Imminent' U.S. Attack
(IsraelNN.com) According to a leading newspaper published in the Netherlands, the Dutch intelligence agency recently recalled operatives from Iran in response to information that a United States attack on the Islamic Republic is "imminent."

see link: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/127444


Ain't happening till after the elections.



Seems more logical it would happen before the elections. I just wonder if the US will use a false flag, attack method.




It COULD go two ways. One, if there's another war going on prior to the election, voters may tend to want to vote for the more qualified person to continue execute that war.

OR

TWO, if it was before the elections people may vote for someone who they think might end that war especially prematurely.

McCain is now fighting being likened to being a continuation of more Bush. If an attack was before the elections option two hurts his chances. Why take it?

Speaking of "Why take it?" Bush will also not take the chance that his successor will take care of Irans nuke program. He has said so many times and I believe him when he says it.


I stand by my earlier post "after the elections" and expand it to "before the inauguration."
THE SEVEN THUNDERS
QUOTE (diverteach @ Sep 2 2008, 08:58 PM) *
QUOTE (Gideon7620 @ Sep 2 2008, 02:55 PM) *
QUOTE (diverteach @ Sep 2 2008, 03:35 PM) *
QUOTE (flyingsquirrel @ Sep 2 2008, 02:04 PM) *
Dutch Spies Recalled From Iran Due to 'Imminent' U.S. Attack
(IsraelNN.com) According to a leading newspaper published in the Netherlands, the Dutch intelligence agency recently recalled operatives from Iran in response to information that a United States attack on the Islamic Republic is "imminent."

see link: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/127444


Ain't happening till after the elections.



Seems more logical it would happen before the elections. I just wonder if the US will use a false flag, attack method.




It COULD go two ways. One, if there's another war going on prior to the election, voters may tend to want to vote for the more qualified person to continue execute that war.

OR

TWO, if it was before the elections people may vote for someone who they think might end that war especially prematurely.

McCain is now fighting being likened to being a continuation of more Bush. If an attack was before the elections option two hurts his chances. Why take it?

Speaking of "Why take it?" Bush will also not take the chance that his successor will take care of Irans nuke program. He has said so many times and I believe him when he says it.


I stand by my earlier post "after the elections" and expand it to "before the inauguration."



What isn't a false flag tactic? You just don't even know what or who to believe anymore, certainly not the spoon-fed propaganda from Washington and the American Mainstream Media. Everything appears to be a devious ploy for some stealth hidden and covert agenda. In the end the American people are being lied to, yet again. There is no more honesty from our elected officials and government; it's out of control.

SEE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqlk3yHTJwY...feature=related

-7
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.