The Reality of Angels - Not Created In God's Image - only Man Is

The Difference Between Angels and Human Beings.
In a time of continued depreciation of the dignity of human beings, in an age in which life has become cheap, we should take note of God's view of them. As we do this we will soon see the unique place human beings have in God's plan for His creation. And the best way of realizing their uniqueness is not by letting our imagination run wild but by studying the differences between angels and human beings.
The angels greatly differ from human beings. We creatures of mortal flesh enjoy a dignity that angels do not enjoy. Although these fellow creatures are in the presence of God Himself and serve Him in all perfection, they are inferior in relation to man. They may be infinitely higher in the scale of things at this very moment than we are; but between them there is a distance and a difference that is vast, and overwhelming in its implications. The essential difference is that angels are not created in the image of God.
After the creation of angels God created man and gave him dominion over the earth (Gen. 1:16). Even in his sinful nature man has not lost his unique stature. He is the fallen prophet, priest and king, the prodigal son.
Angels are spiritual beings,simultaneously yet individually created, who don't have physical relationships and can't form families. They were not created to develop skills or talents or to have dominion over the world. They can't progress from a lower level to a higher level. A human being has a body and a soul; he is born, grows up and dies; angels do not go through the same process. They were complete at their creation. They always remain the same.
The wonder and mystery of the Incarnation clearly shows the distinct difference between man and angels. When the Son of God came into the world He took upon Himself not the form of an angel but of a man. This means that angels have a lower rank in the order of creation than man. And in heaven the ascended Lord didn't set aside His human nature. Paul says that Christians are already now seated with Him in the heavenly realms (Eph. 2:6). As the Heidelberg Catechism confesses: "We have our own flesh in heaven - a guarantee that Christ our head will take us, his members, to himself in heaven." (q. a. 49)
From the throne of honour and power the Lord sends His angels as ministering spirits to serve all who will inherit salvation (Hebr. l:14). The contrast between man and angels is striking. Although angels are morally perfect and in the presence of the Lord of glory, they continue to serve the believers. They can never lord it over these Believers.
Angels then are not only inferior in relation to Christ (Hebr. 1:4ff) but even in relation to believers. Angels do not know the content of redemption. (1 Pet. 1:12) They do not know what it means experientially to have Jesus Christ give His life for the salvation of sinners. They are not the adopted children of the heavenly Father. In Jesus Christ we become the children of the heavenly Father; the angels remain His servants (cf. John 15:15f. ) Believers are to be crowned with glory and honour (Ps. 8:6), and share in Christ's exaltation which exceeds the dignity of angels. And not the angels will judge us but we will judge them. Paul makes this remarkable statement: "Do you not know that we will judge angels?" (1 Cor. 6:3) Calvin opines that Paul refers to the judging of fallen angels.
The Nature of Angels.
What is known about the elusive nature of angels? Our minds can go into a tailspin at trying to find out what they are like. How can one describe the invisible world? Yet Scripture gives us a glimpse of their dazzling nature. Through its "eyes" we can begin seeing the invisible.
Angels are without bodies and hence invisible. Unlike God they are not omnipresent. Yet they seem to be able to be present in more than one place at the same time. They are not restricted or bound by time or space. Although they are pure spirits, they can take on human form whenever it is necessary in the history of salvation. But they often appear to man also in different forms. Two angels came to Lot in the form of men to tell him to get out of Sodom. (Gen. 19) On the day of resurrection the women who went to the tomb saw two men "in clothes that gleamed like lightening" (Luke 24:4) Matthew records that an angel rolled back the stone and sat on it. "His appearance was like lightening, and h is clothes were white as snow " (Mat. 28:2)
.
Angels are endowed with great intelligence (2 Sam. 14:20). They were given perfect intelligence at their creation.
Since they are in the presence of God they have a far clearer view of and a deeper insight into the meaning of all what happens in our world than we do. Our knowledge is always limited, even in our age of computers, internet and amazing technological advances. But angels do not have an autonomous activity alongside God; they function and intervene in the world only as God commands. Their amazing knowledge and power, like that of all creatures, are dependent and derived.
They are capable of great feats of strength,whether it is in slaying over 180. 000 men in an evening, or setting an apostle free from prison (2 Kings 19:35; Acts 12).
When the Bible speaks about heaven and earth, it often refers to angels and man. Our Lord taught us to pray "Our Father in heaven . . . your will be done on earth as it is in heaven" (Matt. 6:9f). The presence of angels encourages Christians to obey God. As the angels carry out God's will in heaven so should we do the same on earth. According to the Heidelberg Catechism, the third request in the Lord's Prayer means, "Help everyone carry out (his or her) work as willingly and faithfully as the angels in heaven." (q. a. 124)
The angels do more than sing praises to God. They also speak. The New International version translates Revelation 5:22 as "in a loud voice they (angels) sang." But the Greek text literally says, "In a loud voice they said." But there is only one text in the Bible which speaks about the language of angels, "If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels" (1 Cor. 13:1). But believers should not spend time in speculating about the nature of the language the angels speak to each other. This is an exercise in futility. Are we ready to listen when an angel addresses us? Of the angel, who was to lead Israel to Canaan, the Bible says: "Pay attention to him and listen to what he says. Do not rebel against him." (Ex. 23:21) When an angel spoke to Zechariah and foretold the birth of John the Baptist, he did not trust his message. He said, "How can I be sure of this? I am an old man and my wife is well along in years." (Luke 1:18) There is always the tragic possibility that the voice of an angel will come to us but we either don't understand it or refuse to listen. We can be like Saul on the Damascus road who heard the voice of the Lord speak in Aramic, his own language, but still asked, "Who are you Lord?" (Acts 26:15)
http://www.reformedreflections.ca/studies/...-of-angels.html
CLAIM: THAT BEFORE THE FLOOD, ANGELS MATED WITH WOMEN ON THE EARTH. QUOTED AS PROOF: GENESIS 6:2,4 "THAT THE SONS OF GOD SAW THE DAUGHTERS OF MEN THAT THEY WERE FAIR; AND THEY TOOK THEM WIVES OF ALL WHICH THEY CHOSE. 4. THERE WERE GIANTS IN THE EARTH IN THOSE DAYS; AND ALSO AFTER THAT, WHEN THE SONS OF GOD CAME IN UNTO THE DAUGHTERS OF MEN, AND THEY BARE CHILDREN TO THEM, THE SAME BECAME MIGHTY MEN WHICH WERE OF OLD, MEN OF RENOWN. " CLAIM: THE SONS OF GOD WERE THE ANGELS THAT WERE CAST OUT OF HEAVEN WITH SATAN.
We examine the Scriptures to see if this statement is true or false.
There is no wording in all of Genesis which says, or even suggest, that Satan and his wicked angels had been cast out of heaven to the Earth at this point of time. We can see that in Job 1:6 and Job 2:1 that Satan was still entering heaven and therefore had not yet been cast out of heaven. This is a long time after Genesis 6:2,4.
In the verses 2 and 4 above, the word "SONS" is translated throughout the bible as the actual son born to mankind, or related to, or descendent from a man, etc. See Strong's definition below.
This word is used 4,906 times in the bible. 01121 ben {bane}We cannot ignore the normal and consistent use of this word. Some say that it can be, and has been, said that when used with the term "sons of God" that it means angels, because the angels are the sons of God. However, While it is true that angels have been called "sons of God" (Job 1:6, 2:1, 38:7), it is also true that man has been called "sons of God" (John 1:12, Romans 8:14, 8:19, Philippians 2:15, 1John 3:1-2). So, which should apply to Genesis?
from 01129; TWOT - 254; n m
Number of times word translated as: (AV = Authorized Version = KJV 1611)
AV - son 2978, children 1568, old 135, first 51, man 20, young 18, young + 01241 17, child 10, stranger 10, people 5, misc 92; 4906
1) son, grandson, child, member of a group
1a) son, male child
1b) grandson
1c) children (pl. - male and female)
1d) youth, young men (pl.)
1e) young (of animals)
1f) sons (as characterization, i.e. sons of injustice [for unrighteous men]
1g) people (of a nation) (pl.)
1h) of lifeless things, i.e. sparks, stars, arrows (fig.)
1i) a member of a guild, order, class
If we look for the meaning of the term "sons of God" throughout the bible, we find that it has the same meaning regardless of where it is used in the bible. Perhaps the best explanation or definition can be found in Romans 8:4 where it says "For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God." Now that very definition eliminates the fallen angels who rebelled against God because they are not, and cannot be, led by the Spirit of God.
Is there any other way that we can determine if the term "sons of God" in Genesis is referring to angels or men? Jesus said in Matthew 22:30 "for in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, BUT ARE AS THE ANGELS OF GOD IN HEAVEN." And again in Mark 12:25 "For when they shall rise from the dead, they neither marry, nor are given in marriage; BUT ARE AS THE ANGELS WHICH ARE IN HEAVEN." This was in response to a question about a woman who had married seven brothers.
Marriage includes a sexual union to produce children. The insight here is on the angels. Since they do not marry, they do not reproduce themselves through a sexual union because God's word makes it clear that any sex outside of marrage is forbidden. This tells us that God made each one of them individually, and there will never be anymore of them than God chooses to produced. On this basis, we can say that angels do not engage in sex and therefore did not engage in sex with the daughters of men.
Is there any other basis that we can use? Yes there is. In Genesis 1:21, 24-25 God repeats the words "after their/his kind" in relation to the reproduction of all of His creations. We see that this holds true in nature today. If different species try to mate, it is either impossible or else there is no offspring, no birth of something that is part one and part of another. On this basis we can also say that angels did not engage in sex with the daughters of men to produce offspring. (The mighty men, men or renown, or giants even).
I think that we have now shown, by the bible, that the term "sons of God" used in Genesis 6:2,4 does not refer to angels and therefore must be referring to men. If this is true, then we will be able to confirm it with the bible.
We have seen in previous scripture in Genesis that Cain turned away from God by doing evil, which resulted in Cain being cursed by God. (Genesis 4:11) Scripture also shows us that Cain had many children (Genesis 4:17- 24) and all of them were concerned with, and went after, the things of the world.
1. Ge. 4:19 there was multiple wives (sexual lust)The descendants of Cain were murderers as was Cain. (Genesis 4:23) Certainly, none of them could be called sons of God because they refused to serve God. We can call them men, and their daughters were then the "daughters of men". On the other side we see also in the scripture of Genesis that another son of Adam and Eve was born, and was called Seth. (Genesis 4:25) Seth had a son called Enos, (Genesis 4:26) who with his descendants, "began men to call upon the name of the Lord". We are then given the Godly line of men who worshipped God and had the Spirit of God in them.
2. Ge. 4:20 amassed physical wealth - cattle (desire to be rich)
3. Ge. 4:21 invented musical instruments (to soothe their tortured souls)
4. Ge. 4:22 made use of brass and iron for tools and for weapons to kill
5. Ge. 4:23 commits murder
(Genesis 5) Since this line of men had the Spirit of God in them, because they feared and worshipped God, we can call them "sons of God" (Romans 8:14, John 1:12) We can now say with confidence that the "daughters of men" were the descendants of Cain while the "sons of God" were the descendants of Seth. It now can be seen that the Godly line of Seth was becoming degenerate because the descendants of Seth were marrying the decendants of Cain, women who were idolaters and as such were polluting the Godly line. If it had continued, Satan would have eliminated the Godly line from which Jesus would come. It would appear that God destroyed the Earth, and all of the sinful line descendent from Cain, to stop that from happening, leaving only the Godly line descendent from Seth to survive the flood.
From the above, we can say that the claim:
That before the flood, Angels mated with women on the Earth. Quoted as proof: Genesis 6:2,4 "That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. 4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown." IS FALSE!
That the Claim: The sons of God were The Angels that were cast out of heaven with Satan IS FALSE! In all respects. There were no angels involved here.
Rev. Jack Barr
http://www.barr-family.com/godsword/claim3.htm
