What is my good buddy SOLANA up to, these days?

the new EU TREATY
1 January 2009............entry into force
1 January 2009


entry into force

SEE ALSO, the wiki article JAVIER SOLANA
he's in the CLUB OF ROME.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reform_Treaty


New impetus

In 2007, Germany took over the rotating EU Presidency and declared the period of reflection over. By March, the 50th anniversary of the Treaties of Rome, the Berlin Declaration was adopted by all member states. This declaration outlined the intention of all member states to agree on a new treaty in time for the 2009 Parliamentary elections, that is to have a ratified treaty before mid-2009.[2]

Already before the Berlin Declaration, the Amato Group (officially the Action Committee for European Democracy, ACED) – a group of European politicians, backed by the Barroso Commission with two representatives in the group – worked unofficially on rewriting the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe (EU Constitution). On 4 June 2007 the group released their text in French – cut from 63,000 words in 448 articles in the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe to 12,800 in 70 articles. In the Berlin Declaration, the EU leaders unofficially set a new timeline for the new treaty;

*



21–23 June 2007


European Council meeting in Brussels, mandate for IGC

*



23 July 2007


launch of Intergovernmental Conference (IGC) in Lisbon, text of Reform Treaty

*



7–8 September 2007


Foreign Ministers’ meeting

*



18–19 October 2007


European Council in Lisbon, final agreement on Reform Treaty

*



13 December 2007


signing of the treaty in Lisbon

*



by end of 2008


ratification by all member states

*



1 January 2009


entry into force

Dennis do you remember how I had a dream years ago...it was after the Madrid Train thing in Spain I believe cant recall right now...
and in the dream with a LOUD VOICE all I heard was SPAIN...
listen for the LORD to direct you all the time, pray without ceasing.

Thanks

dennis

Gotta give you credit here, most people probably never even heard of Solana, and if there's an anti-Christ--a'la Jack van Impe--it's Solana!

Is anybody praying for this poor guy's soul?

I haven't been, but I'm going to start.

The anti christ is not Solano. But he will be in his seat soon. Solano is a smoke screen.

I've had my eye on Solona for several years now. So far I've not seen anything to get me to stop suspecting him as the possible AC.

If he takes credit for 7 year peace plan in the Mid East then we'll know for sure.

Try this guy: Janez Jansa.....He's about ready to take his seat as head of EEU next month and ironically they are ready to lengthen the term from 6 months rotating to 2. years.......

I wonder why?

Hi All,
Hope you don't mind a different thought, but it seems that some "Solona" probably wouldn't conform to the Rev. 13 clue. Moreover, if I were to counterfeit a $20 bill, it would probably have attributes typical of the original, not just "$20" in the corners of an 8.5" x 11" sheet of white paper. Accordingly, the single-point Ronald Wilson Reagon, Bill Gates, etc., are obviously failed candidates.

Shouldn't you expect that a three-fold original would have a three-fold counterfeit, with respective "666" inferences? Personally, I'd look for a "Father" entity which ~sees all~; a "Holy Spirit" entity which is ~pervasive~; and a "Son" entity but without the virgin birth. And as stated above, each should have a "666" association.


Obviously, the Uniform Product Code (UPC) and European Article Numbering (EAN) systems are pervasive, and both conform to a registration mark convention wherein there are two-thin-lines at the beginning, two-thin-lines at the middle, and two-thin-lines at the end. If the scanner correctly reads these lines in their intended orientation, then the product line-values are accepted.

And because programmers use binary, they would select some numeric value for the two-thin-line registration marks, but they would use the fewest "bits" practical for that numeric value because computer memory does have a cost. Accordingly, we could consider the following:

1 = 1
2 = 10
3 = 11
4 = 100
5 = 101
6 = 110
7 = 111
8 = 1000
9 = 1001
10 = 1010
and so forth

You should be aware that single digit "on's" (i.e., 1,2,4) are "low-confidence" because potential stray energies in the computing environment can create a false read. Alternating "on's" (i.e., 5,10)are undesireable because circuits can easily malfunction in that mode, creating a false read. And "all-on's" (i.e. 3,7) are undesireable because circuits can easily malfunction in that mode. This leaves the "110" the best unit for programmers, because there are two "on's" and one "off", without using additional bits of data.

And as identified above, this "6" numeric value is evident at the beginning, middle, and end of UPC and EAN barcodes.


The question is whether the "father" and "son" -666- characteristics are as evident.

-- Anyone care to take a guess? --

Thanks,
DaDad


PS If anyone is perceptive, one might propose that the Master Mathematician reserved the "7" for himself, as one/one/one.