THE NEXT 44TH PRESIDENT WILL BE THE “9/11 PRESIDENT” – THE ANTI-KING OF EVIL

It is quite telling when one considers the number on Hillary Clinton’s State Senate office door is “SR-476”, translating in Nanosequential Gematria into “19-476” and summing to “27” (1 + 9 + 4 + 7 + 6 = “27”); and subsequently reducing to “9” (2 + 7 = “9”)... this is highly significant as I will soon demonstrate, and is a number recurrent with Hillary.

The “conclusive” and “last” book, the “27th” book, in the New Testament, is “Revelation”. Additionally, “9” is the number of “finality”, “destruction” and the “end”. The Temple of Jerusalem was destroyed each of the two times on the 9th day of the Hebrew month of Av. Additionally, Satanists declare that Satan claims the number “9” as his own number; and hence, “9/11” was his diabolical handiwork, the number “9” combined with the number “11”, the number of "disorder", “disintegration”, “disorganization”, "imperfection" and “confusion” as Gematria expert, E. W. Bullinger, has thoroughly researched from the Holy Bible in his classic work: “Numbers in Scriptures: Its Supernatural Design and Spiritual Significance”.

Will Hillary be the “9/11 President”? Let me explain. If elected President of the United States in 2008, Hillary will be the 44th President. However, I have noted something truly odd about the chronology of this pending 44th President being a factor of “11” (“4” [the “World” number] times “11” [the “Disintegration” number]), which appears to be the President who will “dissolve” the United States. Even President George W. Bush appears by all indications to be the “last” President of the United States as we have always known it and the Presidency, and as the 43rd President of the traditional Constitutional United States succession of Presidents where the “first” was named “George” (Washington) and the “last” may very will be also named “George” (Bush) within these 43 Presidents. This seems to be a type of “Alpha and Omega Principle”: that which is “first” is also “last”. However, on the contrary, the 44th President will be something entirely “different” and “alien” to the preceding 43 traditional Presidents, instead, this coming President will most likely take on the role to “dismantle” and "disintegrate" the United States.

Now, I had realized that if one considers ALL the Presidents since the “inception” of the “American President” (“The Anti-King”), including under the First Continental Congress, Second Continental Congress, and United States in Congress Assembled, there is an addition of 19 more Presidents besides the current 43 traditional Constitutional Presidents of the United States. So in total the next 44th President will actually be the “63rd” in succession (44 + 19 = “63”). Hence, this appears to be in keeping with Hillary’s “nine numeric theme”, for the number “63” reduces to “9” (6 + 3 = “9”), the number of “conclusion”, “destruction” and Satan, the Adversary to Christ. Thus, the concept of the “The Anti-King” takes on a whole new meaning, being that of the “spirit of antichrist”, being the king against the “King of Kings”, Christ Jesus. This may not mean that the 44th President will “literally” be “THE” Antichrist (the Beast from the sea), but most likely and logically this President will be of the “spirit of antichrist”.

But I said this 44th President will be the “9/11 President”… so where is the “11” in this numeric relationship, the number of “disintegration”, “disorganization”, “imperfection”, and “confusion”, which will also be the attributes to be stamped upon and mar this next Presidency?

Here it is… if only the “12” Presidents of the United States in Congress Assembled is considered and added to the 44 traditional Presidents, then the total becomes “56”. This number becomes “11” (5 + 6 = “11”). It is interesting to note that the word “curse” is used “56” times in the OT and the word “injustice” is used “56” times in the entire Bible. So in totality hidden in the 44th President is the esoteric identity of the “9/11 President”, being the “President of Destruction, Disintegration & Confusion”, whose administration will become a “curse” and be an “injustice”.

And I suspect this next President will be Hillary Clinton, whose birth name is “Hillary Diane Rodham”, which computes to the number “1062” in Sumerian/English Gematria, reducing to the singular digit “9” (1 + 0 + 6 + 2 = “9”), the number of “destruction”, “finality”, and the number that Satan claims as his own.

And, as Satan’s own "Anti-King", this “9/11 President” shall exemplify the Roman goddess Diana (Greek Artemis) as reflected in her middle name “Diane”, for the word “virgin” is used “56” times in the OT, as well, and the goddess Diana was not just a huntress and protector of animals, but “guardian of virginity”. The particular “virginity” that Hillary embodies is not abstinence from sex and the retaining of sexual virginity, but abstinence from “male affection and intercourse”, being the practice of “Lesbianism”, staying true to the attributes of the more ancient Artemis who cruelly threatened any maiden who turned to the role of “wife”, a role Hillary loathes, and who presided over the initiation rituals of young girls.

Also, Artemis was goddess of the "Moon" and "twin sister" of her brother Apollo (the solar deity), who is befittingly identified in Revelation "9:11" ("9/11") as "the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in Hebrew is Abaddon, but in Greek he has the name Apollyon"! This is Satan. And, as the "Moon" does not have its own light but reflects the light of the Sun, the Moon's "light" is "artificial" and a "False Light" reflected from the "Light Bearer" or "Angle of Light", being "Lucifer" (Satan's beautiful form). Thus, Hillary-Diana as the "9/11 President" will be intricately fused in affinity with the entity of Revelation 9:11 in this 27th book of the Bible.

We can further see the genuinely sinister attributes of the number "11" as laid out by E. W. Bullinger, the definitive scholar of Biblical numbers, as he points out the “11” kings and rulers “offended” with the Truth proclaimed by God’s servants:

1.) Pharaoh… Ex 10:28
2.) Balak… Num 24:10
3.) Jeroboam… I Kings 13:4
4.) Ahab… I Kings 22:27
5.) Naaman… 2 Kings 5:12
6.) Asa… 2 Ch 16:10
7.) Joash… 2 Ch 24:21
8.) Uzziah… 2 Ch 26:19
9.) Jehoiakim… Jer 26:21
10.) Zedekiah… Jer 32:3
11.) Herod… Mat 14:3


The following men served as the President of the First Continental Congress:• Peyton Randolph (September 5, 1774 – October 21, 1774) and
• Henry Middleton (October 22, 1774 – October 26, 1774)

The following men served as the President of the Second Continental Congress:• Peyton Randolph (May 10, 1775 – May 23, 1775)
• John Hancock (May 24, 1775 – October 31, 1777)
• Henry Laurens (November 1, 1777 – December 9, 1778)
• John Jay (December 10, 1778 – September 27, 1779)
• Samuel Huntington (September 28, 1779 – March 1, 1781)

The following men served as President of the United States in Congress Assembled:• Samuel Huntington (March 1, 1781[2] – July 9, 1781)
• Thomas McKean (July 10, 1781 – November 4, 1781)
• John Hanson (November 5, 1781 – November 3, 1782)
• Elias Boudinot (November 4, 1782 – November 2, 1783)
• Thomas Mifflin (November 3, 1783 – October 31, 1784)
• Richard Henry Lee (November 30, 1784 – November 6, 1785)
• John Hancock (November 23, 1785 – June 5, 1786) Due to Hancock's failing health the following two people acted as president in his stead:
o David Ramsay (November 23, 1785 – May 12, 1786)
o Nathaniel Gorham (May 15, 1786 – June 5, 1786)
• Nathaniel Gorham (June 6, 1786 – November 5, 1786)
• Arthur St. Clair (February 2, 1787 – November 4, 1787)
• Cyrus Griffin (January 22, 1788 – March 2nd, 1789)


Blessings…

-7

This is slightly off topic but in keeping with the next major power figure, what are some thoughts out there concerning the next Pope?

I ask this question with the prophecies of St. Malachy in mind. If your not familiar with them, keyword it into any search engine and you'll get many many hits.

In summary basically, years ago St. Malachy predicted just so many pope's, thier names, and the meaning of thier names. So far his prophecies are 100% correct. According to this account there is only one more pope to come before Jesus comes. Like all previous pope's they choose thier papal name like the current Pope formerly known as cardinal Ratzinger choose the name Benedict.

Before I continue just a quick little papal history note for those not familiar with the Pope's origin.

Jesus' favorite disciple Peter was the first Pope. This is where Matthew 16:18 comes from "And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it." So basically ever since Peter the Pope has carried on leading the church.

Never since Peter has a newly elected Pope chosen the papal name Peter. Out of respect for whatever reason it just hasn't been done until what St. Malachy says the last Pope takes as him name. According to him, the Pope elected after the current Pope Benedict is gone will take on the name "Petrus Romanus" latin for Peter the Roman.

In persecutione extrema S.R.E. sedebit Petrus Romanus, qui pascet oves in multis tribulationibus: quibus transactis civitas septicollis diruetur, & Judex tremêdus judicabit populum suum. Finis.
(In extreme persecution, the seat of the Holy Roman Church will be occupied by Peter the Roman, who will feed the sheep through many tribulations, at the term of which the city of seven hills will be destroyed, and the formidable Judge will judge his people. The End.)

When Pope John Paul II died and the cardinal went into seclusion to elect his predecessor, I remember watching the news and all the pundits speculating on who they'd select. Most were in agreement that this person would be somebody who wouldn't last long. Definately not as long as John Paul did, but somebody who'd be acting more as an intermediary. In short, an older person. Enter Cardinal Ratzinger.

Prior to his election his health was not in the best shape. In fact, upon hearing news that Ratzinger had been chosen, his own brother was stunned because he knew of his poor health. More can be read here http://www.infowars.com/articles/world/pop...o_concerned.htm


I'm wondering how his health is holding up and possibly any sign that things may not all be well as another indicator of just how close we are to those last days.

This is probably a little off-topic as well, but the error of Peter as the first Pope needs to be addressed.

Matthew 16:18 follows verses 13-17, which are included below, along with verses 19 and 20. Context is most important to eliminate error.

13 When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?

14 And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets.

15 He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?

16 And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.

17 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.

18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. (Note: "this rock," not "you")

19 And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

20 Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ.

The subject of this passage is not Peter, but rather the revelation to Peter and the disciples that Jesus is the Christ, which is summed up in verse 20.

The Greek word used for Peter is "petros" or a small stone. However, the word for rock used here is "petra," meaning a large, solid bedrock. The two are not the same, and Peter is not the foundation. Jesus is the foundation rock being revealed to the world by the Father (vs.17) through the Spirit (Eph.3:5) to the building of the church (Eph.2:20 - also reveals Jesus as the principle foundation "corner" stone).

Of course, I can mention that Peter had a wife (Matt. 8:14). Popes don't generally have wives, if I recall.

This is a really BIG issue. It's not just a matter of semantics. It identifies which is the true church and which is the false. It identifies who is the true foundation stone and who is not.

May the Lord bless the reading of his word as we study to show ourselves approved.

In Christ,

Mike


www.OneArk.org - 'cause it's important to know