QUOTE(BrotherJon @ Dec 28 2007, 12:26 AM) [snapback]138853[/snapback]
QUOTE
Since you obviously seem to believe that what you say is in accordance with Scripture I will put you some questions.
(1) Why should Jesus Christ be in need of being born as the man child in the sense of the Lord in his corporate body in spite of his already being alive in the hearts of the Christians since apostolic time?
(2) Why should Jesus Christ as the man child be in need of being caught up to God?
(3) When will the foretold falling-away in Christianity come true, before or after the time of the man child?
Whatever your answers will be to these questions you will end up in difficulties as long as you maintain that the man child is the Lord in his corporate body.
Dear BrotherJon,
Thanks for the answer. I will now comment on them and show that they don't hold water and therefore are contrary to Holy Scripture.
You wrote:
QUOTE
OK....I do this for the readers.....
My answer:
Why not for me too, since I did put you these questions in sincerity to show you that what you maintain is against Scripture, and what is against Scripture is from the Devil. You should be relieved to get loose from his deception.
You wrote:
QUOTE
My answers to your simple questions.
1. The "birth" of the Man-Child is simply the maturing of the first-fruits. Jesus said this would happen. Look---
My answer:
What you are doing, for one thing, is misusing the term "first-fruits" and attributing meanings to Jesus that he never ever taught. Jesus never told that the man child is the maturing of the first fruit, that is a lie on your part and a mere distortion of Scripture. When Jesus talks about the man child he says this in Matt 24:45:
"Who then is THE FAITHFUL SERVANT and wise servant, whom the master has put in charge of the servants in his household to give them their food at the proper time?"
He did not say "servants" as though there would be many of them. No, Jesus said that there would come a specific SERVANT whom God WILL PUT IN CHARGE OF THE SERVANTS (who are many), but the faithful one is JUST ONE PERSON. And those whom this one servant is put in charge of ARE THE FIRST-FRUITS. Those who are the first fruits are the first ones to be harvested, not the second ones, so there must further be a reason why they ARE the first fruits, not only some kind of "maturing", as you say it. No, the serious fact is that they are the first fruits AFTER THE FALLING-AWAY, which I can prove from Scripture beyond refutation. If there is no falling-away before the time of the 144000 elected, THEY will not be the first fruits. The first fruits of the New Covenant were those who heard and believed the apostles. Without a falling-away in the time between the apostles and the 14400 elected people the 144000 will merely be, at the best, the second fruits. This is one thing among others that show clearly that you are wrong, and that the man child is no corporate body of believers. Scripture clearly shows it. If you still dont believe this, then let me give you more scriptures to prove it. In Rev 5:1-4 you can read this:
"Then I saw in the right hand of him who sat on the throne a scroll with writing on both sides and sealed with seven seals. And I saw a mighty angel proclaiming in a loud voice, "Who is worthy to break the seals and open the scroll?" But no one in HEAVEN or on EARTH or under the EARTH could open the scroll or even look inside it. I wept and wept because no one was found who was worthy to open the scroll or look inside."
Don't be blind to the biblical fact that NOBODY, NOT EVEN IN HEAVEN, WAS FOUND WORTHY TO BREAK THE SEALS AND OPEN THE SCROLL! This foretells a falling-away, since heaven here means the church on earth, as Heb 12:22 proves. Jesus is in God's invisible eternal heaven, but he is not included in this heaven where nobody was found worthy, for that heaven was fallen away from God. This means that the second sign of Rev 12 had come and taken the place where the true woman had been sitting earlier as the true church of God. This is why John wept, and this is why God has to return spiritually through a true and faithful witness. About His coming back spiritually like this he says (Luke 18:8): "when the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on the earth?" There is no doubt about it that when He comes back in person on the very LAST DAY He will find faith on earth, so that coming is not meant here. Since this is what Scripture tells us it is also true that the witness through whom Jesus comes back spiritually is called THE ROOT of Jesse Isa 11:10. This ROOT of Jesse is the BRANCH of Isa 11:1, that is, not Jesus in person, but the spirit of Jesus Christ in this one true and faithful servant. Jesus himself is called "shoot" of Jesse in Isa 11:1. It is further foretold that this ROOT will be like a BANNER FOR THE PEOPLES in that day (Isa 11:10), for in him the Lord will sit spiritually and judge as foretold in Isa 11:4:
"He will strike the earth with the rod of his mouth;
with the breath of his lips he will slay the wicked."
Here you see the secret of Rev 2:27:
"He will rule them with an iron scepter; he will dash them to pieces like pottery— just as I (Jesus) have received authority from my Father. I will also give him the morning star."
Notice that Jesus gives this authority to a specific witness who will be the one coming with the MORNING (STAR) after the falling-away. You can read about this same witness also in Rev 10:1-2 and Rev 7:2. That he comes from the rising of the sun means that he has the morning star Jesus in his heart and therefore is a true witness. When the morning star Jesus is in his heart he will spiritually be sitting with the Lord on His throne as also foretold in Rev 3:21. There is no denying this biblical fact, nor the biblical fact that the spirit of the Lord in this witness is the one to open the seals of the little book (Rev 5:2). Notice from Rev 5:5 that it is not the ROD OF THE STEM OF JESSE (Jesus) but the ROOT OF DAVID (the man child), who according to Isa 11:1 is the BRANCH. You can read of this true witness also in Isa 41:25:
"I have raised up one from the NORTH, and he shall come: from THE RISING OF THE SUN shall he call upon my name: and he shall come upon princes as upon morter, and as the potter treadeth clay."
Nobody can deny that this servant of God will do exactly as the one who will be sitting with Jesus Christ on His spiritual throne. This verse is in accordance with Zech 6:8. So, you do well to yourself as long as you don't reject these biblical facts, but woe to you if you don't take these things seriously.
You wrote:
QUOTE
John 16:19 Jesus perceived that they were desirous to ask him, and he said unto them, Do ye inquire among yourselves concerning this, that I said, A little while, and ye behold me not, and again a little while, and ye shall see me?
John 16:21 A woman when she is in travail hath sorrow, because her hour is come: but when she is delivered of the child, she remembereth no more the anguish, for the joy that a man is born into the world.
As you can see....Jesus Himself said He would be "seen" again as a child born to a woman.
My answer:
Yes, it is a well-known thing that the Christian church is described as a woman, but still it is a big jump from there to maintaining that the MAN CHILD in Rev 12:5 is the Lord in a corporate body of believers. What Jesus was telling his disciples had got to do with his bodily death, and even though His resurrection from the dead convinced them of his being the promised Messiah he never said or implied that he would then be the MAN CHILD of Rev 12:5. That he would be the Lord in them through their faith in him by then is correct, but since the book of Revelation still was to be written and foretell the coming of the MAN CHILD, he could not mean that he was the man child. You cannot mean that and be in accordance with Scripture, for Jesus himself tells us in Rev 3:21 that the man child should be sitting with him on His throne. How can we be sure that that person is the man child? Well, because the man child is the one to overcome the deception of Antichrist, so therefore he is mentioned in Rev 2:7, 2:11, 2:17, 2:26-28, 3:5, 3:12, and 3:21. These verses imply that there has been a total falling-away beforehand, a spiritual night (John 9:4), so the Lord has got no true church on earth any more. Therefore the Scripture foretells that there will come a person who overcomes this Antichristian night and deception, and he is mentioned in Isa 66:7:
"A voice of noise from the city, a voice from the temple, a voice of the LORD that rendereth recompence to his enemies. Before she travailed, she brought forth; before her pain came, she was delivered of a MAN CHILD. Who hath heard such a thing? who hath seen such things? Shall the earth be made to bring forth in one day? or shall a nation be born at once? for as soon as Zion travailed, she brought forth her children."
Who would say that this foretells the birth of Jesus? Scripture tells us that this birth is connected with recompense to his enemies, and exactly that is what the birth and mission of the man child is, unlike the spiritual birth of the disciples of Jesus! After the man child there come many others, and they will be the first fruits. What is meant by Zion here is Scripture, for through the Word of God comes faith and truth, the truth that the man child attained to.
You wrote:
QUOTE
2. You obviously don't understand scriptural patterns that we are to follow. Just as Joseph was "caught up to the throne" (Pharoah) Just as Moses was "caught up to the throne" (Mt.Sinai) the first fruits will have the same experience before they start their ministry. They will be ordained by the Lord to teach because they are overcomers. This catching up to the throne is not for "Jesus" (duh) but for the 144,000. They STAND on Mt. Zion. (caught up) They receive authority from God to be true leaders in the church.
[/b]
My answer:
You speak like a dragon and totally contrary to Scripture! My question was this: (2) Why should Jesus Christ as the man child be in need of being caught up to God? I did not ask about Joseph or whoever but about the Lord, and the reason was that you maintained that the Lord was the man child in a corporate body of believers. Are you now changing opinion in an attempt of escape? Was the man child the Lord himself, as you said, or was he not? I have proved earlier in this writing that the man child is not the Lord. Can you refute it? If you now change opinion and say that the Lord is not the man child, then my criticism of you was correct. Let me repeat what the predicament of yours is now: If the man child is the Lord, then why should he be caught up, not only to the throne, but even up to God? Was not the woman already in heaven, or is not the Lord already in heaven? You don't know what you are talking about! That is for sure!
You wrote:
QUOTE
3.[/b] The great falling away happens when the son of perdition is revealed. This corresponds with the betrayal of Judas whom Jesus called, the Son of Perdition. The same thing will happen again since history repeats.
My answer:
Are you spiritually drunk? Don't you know from 2 Thess 2 that WHEN THE SON OF PERDITION IS REVEALED, then is the end of falsehood and falling-away come to an end? Scripture reveals you to be a lier!
You wrote:
QUOTE
There are those who are hidden in the "body" of believers who will turn on the Lord and take the mark of the beast. This will reveal them just as it did Judas. They, like him, will be filled with the spirit of the AntiChrist.
My answer:
What has this got to do with what I asked you about? Does this just prove that I am correct in saying that you are in a predicament and cannot answer these questions?
You wrote:
QUOTE
I don't expect Peh to learn anything here.....but maybe there are a few who are truly Christians who will hear His voice.
Blessings to all the real disciples out there!

My answer:
So you mean that you have learnt enough already, in spite of all that being totally against Scripture! For your own sake I recommend you to speak less and listen more!
With sorrow in heart
PehJeshua