Genesis 7;19
amplified bible

and the waters prevailed so exceedingly and were so mighty upon the earth that ****ALL**** the high hills under the ***WHOLE*** sky were covered.


my thoughts:

this Flood was not a local flood..............it was WORLD-WIDE,,,,,,,,under the WHOLE sky.


thanks to ANSWERSINGENESIS.ORG

Though there are obvious "local flood" accounts in various places, academia's use of these as a rationale to disprove Noah’s global flood is dishonest reasoning. Rather, the various flood accounts from diverse places should be interpreted as pointing to a common global flood.

If this were not so, then:

Why are there marine fossils on the sheer 5-mile high mountainous walls of the Himalayans of Tibet?

Why does the Mississippi River Valley have a dichotomy line indicating an ancient shoreline that creates the shape of a great inland sea that once existed in the center of the U.S. if this was not the result of "continental runoff" from a global flood? Even the physical topography patterns in the Lower Mississippi Valley (Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Missouri) indicate land formations created from great hydraulic runoff in relationship to ground elevation and how the water would have drained off the continent driven by gravity from higher elevation to lower elevation, and down into the Louisiana Delta alluvium plain to the Gulf of Mexico.

Why do the ancient folklore accounts of the Oklahoma Indians relay a catastrophic event of the Pacific Ocean violently rising over the 2-mile high Rocky Mountains and crashing down and inundating their entire land in a great deluge? The Pacific Ocean is 1,500 miles away from Oklahoma.

And we are to believe the anti-global flood critics with their utterly fantastic claim that the intsy-wintsy-tinsy Colorado River carved gazillions of metric tons of soil out of the earth to create the Grand Canyon? If so, I have some property on the Moon I’d like to sell them.