The Bible-Code Digest site attempts to look at the codes that way. But my purpose is not really to prove anything scientifically, but rather to state what is there and to leave it for others to decide whether it be random of not. I am personally convinced that it is not random, but I am also convinced that it is possible to have whole paragraphs of ramblings in Hebrew that kind of look like real speech but is not. There are many such examples on the internet and there may be some of that on my site too. It is not always easy to tell the difference. The following is an article that I am currently writing which addresses the issue that you are legitimately raising.
Did you know that even random text can produce what at first look appear to be some-what garbled real sentences! The fact of the matter is that Hebrew is ideally suited to form codes. This does not mean that there are no genuine bible codes, but it does call for a large degree of skepticism. I have seen whole paragraphs of supposed Hebrew on the internet, but after many years of study in this phenomena I am convinced that the vast majority are just random chance. There may be error mixed in with the codes on this site too. Remember, codes are not on the same level as the plain bible. God will not have it so. You will have to judge whether a line of code on this website has a ring of truth to it and something worthy of God or not. However, one will always have a degree of uncertainty as to validity when it comes to codes. That's just the way it is. Again, God would not have it otherwise, lest men elevate codes above the plain reading of God's word.

Sometimes there may be a code even though the grammar is terrible. For instance, I would have dumped the Moth Bible Code long ago for this reason if it were not that it seemed to have come true, as odd as it was. Thus, not all codes on this site are equal. There are a few codes on this site that I, myself, have some doubts about whereas others I have no reasonable doubt. The Mene Tekel Bible Code (in its simplified version) and the Hand code are perhaps the soundest codes.

Also of high reliability is the Yeshua Bible Code and especially the Balance Bible Code (except for some of the details about the hurricanes --- yes, it is possible that I took it too far!), and then the Lamb Bible Code. The Lion/Acrostic Bible Prophecy is also very powerful, though the massive acrostic is admittedly choppy at points which give grounds for some doubt, though I personally am convinced of it. The Menorah, too, is powerful and whatever it lacks in Hebrew it makes up for in numeric. Also see the acrostic in the genealogy and names code. I am also reasonable convinced of them. The rest I have less confidence, though for certain subjective reasons I think they are genuine and thus I leave them posted for now on the website. But as far as proving anything, I do not believe some of the codes on this site will at all do that.

If one is seeking 100% proof then I think that they will be disappointed with the codes. But this goes for bible prophecy in general too, for the skeptics are right when they point out that many bible prophecies (though not all --- just like the codes) can be interpreted in different ways. But even if you saw Jesus rise from the dead with your own eyes, could you be sure that you were simply not imagining it or that it was not a deception of some kind?

In the end, God requires us to walk by a degree of faith. Why? Because faith is a moral issue. The bible teaches that to fail to believe God (generally speaking), though given the evidence, is a moral decision to rebel and not a problem with a lack of evidence. God will supply the evidence for those that seek it. Remember doubting Thomas? And so, my studies in bible numbers, the 360 calendar, and in the bible codes together give strong reasons to believe that the Bible is God's book, for the bible codes interweave with the bible numbers and the 360 calendar and always go together. (This is one of my personal criterion for authenticity.) But there will always be a degree of doubt, however small. You must choose what to do with that small margin of doubt. Will you give God the benefit of the doubt or cast off restraint for want of supposed 100% proof? Even in a court of law there is always a degree of doubt, and yet there is that subjective threshold that one must cross when one decides that "beyond a reasonable doubt" such and such is true. Of course, whether one believes the bible codes to be true is certainly not a salvation issue, but whether one believes and obeys the bible is.

My ambition on this website was to declare the glory of God in the numbers and codes and not to get hung up on attempting to prove something scientifically as if God must bow to scientific protocol. I have declared what I have found as best I could. You should test it and be blessed by whatever you are reasonable convinced is true. And numerous signs and wonders followed the opening of these picture bible codes to me, some personal, but most international and some even in the heavens, and each along a clear numeric grid, and so forth. Yes, this is subjective reasoning, but God never reveals Himself through a servant to others without being personal and by leaving His Almighty mark that vindicates His word. It would be contrary to the character of God to do otherwise. For God is love. And whenever He reveals His Son Jesus, He always does so in a personal and powerful way. So I am not ashamed of the subjective side of what God has shown me, though admittedly it may mean nothing to the skeptic. But it is what squeezes whatever small degree of remaining doubt away, and grants me the courage, though sporadic at times, to proclaim things considered controversial even to my brethren in Christ. For had not God been on my side to watch over His words even when my own faith waned I would long ago have bowed to men.

Remember, codes are not on the same level as the plain bible. God will not have it so.

There are a few codes on this site that I, myself, have some doubts about whereas others I have no reasonable doubt. The Mene Tekel Bible Code (in its simplified version) and the Hand code are perhaps the soundest codes.

...God never reveals Himself through a servant to others without being personal and by leaving His Almighty mark that vindicates His word. It would be contrary to the character of God to do otherwise. For God is love. And whenever He reveals His Son Jesus, He always does so in a personal and powerful way. So I am not ashamed of the subjective side of what God has shown me, though admittedly it may mean nothing to the skeptic. But it is what squeezes whatever small degree of remaining doubt away, and grants me the courage, though sporadic at times, to proclaim things considered controversial even to my brethren in Christ....

A Jewish settler boy walks past a house with a Star of David and Hebrew gaffitti saying 'people of Israel live' at the settlement of Shirat Hayam, in the Southern Gaza Strip.

Exponential.....

There is a certain fear in that for me.

The complexity and vastness of God is incomprehensible in this body.

This is one of the things l came to understand as l studied astrology. The vast complexity of angles and progressions..wheels intersecting wheels and all the variables it produces...not to forget the nodes of moon and all intricacies of planetary space. Always moving and changing. I had a new understanding of why God protects us from this place.

I see the true codes as progressive as well and vastly complex. They are unfolding exponential and two are being declared....like it or not.

I find this struggle to discern the who's hoo of the codes has taxed me.

There's a huge lure to "know" things... A mystery and temptation. It's in our nature.

My dog obeys me at the snap of my fingers when he's in the yard. If l let him out front where it's not fenced the lure of the smell is so great he won't come when l call...It's like he's obsessed...I have to threaten and chase him with the "rolled up newspaper" to get him to come back. Finally he slinks back, tail between his legs.

I like the safety of the written word. In a way, like a fenced back yard. God's vastness is frightening to me. My dog has no idea what lies beyond the edge of my property...Like any small child doesn't. I feel like that small child this morning.

Some of you are good with numbers and trails...always able to come back home..retracing your steps...I'm not so sure this morning..of myself and my walk .. away from the fenced yard... into the DMZ.

Nebuchadnezzar was the father of Belshazzar. The writing on the wall was addressed to Belshazzar that fateful night when he was slain and Babylon fell. And with the falling of a king goes the fall of his gods. "...They themselves go off into captivity," (Isaiah 46:2).

Nebuchadnezzar was named after Nebu (Nebo) and Belshazzar was named after the god Bel (also called Marduk). Ironically, though king Nebuchadnezzar was the father of Belshazzar, the god Bel was considered the father of Nebu. When Belshazzar was weighed in the balances that night, so was his god Bel---and likewise his son Nebu.

Thus, Bel and Nebu are the demonic mimic of the Father and Son (Jesus). Bel was chief god and Nebu (his son) was the god of wisdom and literature. Contrast this with Jesus who is called, "The Word of God" and, "The Son of God."

Nebu was said to impart the 'light' of wisdom; similarly, Jesus is called "the light," and "the lamp." Thus, fittingly, we here have a contest on these very scales of light. The contest is this: Who is really like the Father---the only true God? Is Nebu, (or his father Bel?) Or is it Jesus Christ of Nazareth? This, of course, is the very thing the actual surface text of Isaiah 46 is itself portraying. Thus, the picture-code agrees completely with the surface text. Both are portraying a contest between the gods of Babylon and the One True God.

The contest begins; Nebu is found wanting, whereas Jesus is found to have the exact radiance (light) of God the Father! (Heb. 1.)