QUOTE(excubitor @ Mar 8 2007, 11:05 PM) [snapback]104740[/snapback]
People who don't believe that Ezekiels temple is millenial basically ignore all of those many chapters which describe it and do not believe it will be built at all. Or else they believe it is all symbolic.
Why do yo ucall them ignorant of the many chapters? is it possible that they read the chapter details maybe a little better than you did?
Just think for a few moments as an initial investigation....
Go back to the very beginning of the temple chapters and start rreading for crtain clues....
1. To whom was the ezekiel temple instructions given to?
2. To whom wa this person to give those instructions to?
3. Was there a condition that came with it? a blessing or something?
4. Skip forward and consider the application that no uncircumcized individual is or will be allowed in. That wil leave most of you all our who are men since it is a physical circumcision and the epistles of paul are not going to be made nought because of some legalistic viewpoint. Christ becomes nothing to those who are circumcised in teh flesh, believing it gains you entry intot he kingdom of God, yet here, it is arequirement.... thus, for those who think Chrsit is going to teach those who were not taught or could not be taught before, they are also blaspheming the spirit by believing the spirit sent forth, the spirit of His only son was not sufficient in causing a sould to repent, rather, his physical presence will, thus you are trumping the spirit as not being all powerful, just partially.....
the ezekiel temple is not symbolic.. the words there are not. However, as God told Moses to make a pattern of what he saw in the heavenlies on earth, we can kow that any temple would have also followed similar pattern sa we have seen thruou the Old TEstament. So, in fact, ALL TEMPLES were all patterns of something else! They pointed to something else...
SEcondly, the ezekiel temple was given t be presented and IF they accepted it's plans given by a certain someone (above), then it owuld have occured, it was a test of faith of God's people, We know his people FAILED. the later books of Nehemiah and others atest tot eh faithlessness of His people, in fact, the actual temple that was built and later improved upon by Herod was just that, a failure of God's people to have faith....
The temple was a blessing that never happened NOR will it ever happen. Do not be so quick to call out people as being ignorant of certain chapters when in fact, the rreality is, others are ignorant of reading certain parts of those chapters for exactly what they say.
You all claim literalness, a literal temple, you don't want symbolic, neither does the text assume symbolic, it is literal. But when it comes to certain things , details, you all push thos texts aside as allogorical or symbolic or meant for another to fulfill, going totally contrary to the texts themselves....
Be a berean and search deeper into the texts, not get so caught up on the details of the building itself and miss that it can't happen unless certain requirements were first met....
NExt, some individuals have started to quote passages from th old TEstament that gives detail so waht they presume is the millenium such as "in that day" quotes.... Unfortunately, they haven't studied, and are also ignorant of many passages that speak of messiah that are tied into "on that day" or "in that day" and how many were tied into NT prophecy fulfillments....
You all also assume there are three groups of people. Those who accept Christ, those who do not and are damned and then those who do not but get some second chance, thus God plays favorites. That is so ingrained and given excuse after blind excuse as to why some of you believe this, that it is impossible to just get into that subject on one post.... You all find what yo uthink are unfulfilled prophecies and neatly place everything, understood or not, into some future millenium. lets take the temple, stick it into the millenium cuz it hasn't happened yet. lets take all these prophecies regarding Israel and place them in some future millenium cuz again, they remain unfulfilled. But then NEGLECT to see that the Holy ones that come out of jerusalem in that day were the first church to whom ALL of the prophecies regarding israel went to, the nation was seperated out, the good and the evil and the godod, the oily ones became called out, seperated out and became known as the church, the NT attests to so so so so many OT promises given to israel and israel Alone used for the church. I wonder who is playiing replacement theology? sonds like God is. Becasue in fact, there was NO replacement. out of national israel, only a remnant EVER were called out as holy, as in Elijah's day, as in the days of the early church, and so to, today!....
Claiming the promises of Abraham because of circumcision did Israel nothing, claiming Moses does israel nothing today. those who held on to their imaginatry understandings, their phariseeic national militaristic approach to jerusalem all died in 70 AD and 135 AD. they were wiped out... the expectations that were phariseeic are alive today in premillenialism and the ezekiel temple is just one more thing they think will happen, yet, when yo ureally study the text, it is IMPOSSIBLE for it to happen sa the text states, the time peirod for it's building is gone. Why? Cuz the messenger died 2500 years ago and the people to whom hte message was given to died 2500 years ago and they failed miserably. You can't claim tha which is lost by trying to renew the words as symbolic, yet everything else is literal... That is playing games with the text....
Prove from the text that it is futuristic and never meant for the days the words were given in. Find direct proof of this.. FIND IT.....
Something straightforward and direct. Don't take a heavenly temple in Revelation and make it into some ;pysical temple and claim it is ezekiels, there is no tie in...
I assume yo uall claim there are two temples to be built. on during some tribulation, and then one right afterwards.. I guess two in a matter of 7 years or so? Both reverting to shadow?