Rather than respond directly I felt moved to post this thread as a study to this hypothesis; is the Gospel independent of a symbol that is the cross?
As with any study I have posted I always entreat upon the Lord a prayer for guidance and understanding. Lord, I pray your Holy Spirit will grant wisdom and inspire a sincere understanding to the meaning of the cross. Let this be a a good thread that honors your name, in Jesus' name, Amen.
I am led to start with Numbers 21:9
Numbers 21:9
And Moses made a serpent of brass, and put it upon a pole, and it came to pass, that if a serpent had bitten any man, when he beheld the serpent of brass, he lived.
In this instance what Moses had done was to clearly create an icon, a symbol out of material, at the Lord's instruction. Yet this symbol, being immaterial, imparted the Lord's power to save those who had looked upon it, and for those who did not died. This is very compelling to me to believe the symbol of the cross has a "mystical" connection to the Lord; his presence being around it for it inspires one to look upon the cross and see it more than just a crucifix. It is the symbol of the resurrection and the life of Jesus Christ.
Now, why did the Lord choose a serpent to hang on a pole? This was a symbol, according to the bible, that Moses did fashion and that it literally saved people from dying after being bitten by the snakes that were in the vally they travelled through. Today, that symbol is often represented with Christ fastened on the crucifix. So, could God have told Moses to fashion a man on a pole and it would have had the same effect? No. The Lord told Moses to fashion a serpent on a pole, why a serpent then, and why Christ on the crucifix today?
Your comments are welcomed and please any referencing scriptures will be very helpful to this discussion.

Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote
