[galaxee]

Quotes from the article:

"The Implications

Please, allow me to connect the dots here...

* The DNC drafted, signed and notarized TWO slightly different versions of their Official Certification of Nomination documents, not one.
* One of those documents had complete legal language, and one of them was missing the text concerning the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama.
* The version which is absent any certification of constitutional standing for the office of President is the version that was filed with every state in the country, and the one used by the DNC to elect Barack Obama President."

Please someone look at the article and give us an educated opinion on what is being said. I just don't understand how this, if true, could keep going on and no one is saying anything about it. How are we supposed to know??

Here is the full article, help please, I keep finding these type of reports but no real answers as to what can be done. All the president has to do is show the darn document and put it all to rest or face some very mad people.

Read article here

[dennis mann]

lots of issues are un-constitutional and corrupt,
social security, medicare, education, etc

but , the corrupt dems and repubs control all 3 branches of govt, plus the media, plus most other large institutions,,,,so, nothing is ever done about it

[Chuck]

galaxee said:

The Theory is Now a Conspiracy And Facts Don't Lie

That doesn't make any sense.

I believe there are people posting intentionally misguiding material on this board. I keep an open mind, but I have seen too many examples.

galaxee said:

The Theory is Now a Conspiracy

That does not make sense, except in a drug-like, quasi-hallucinatory way. Classic of Alex Jones-type material. And there are a number of examples of this.

Going down these Alex Jones-type roads does not help you.

I believe Obama is ineligible, but this "there are two documents!!" etc. stuff is misleading, doesn't get us anywhere, and is exactly the kind of thing I would put out if I wanted people on the wrong track,

If I'm wrong, then prove me wrong by posting things that make sense.

[galaxee]

Chuck, are you a moderator? Were there any rules violated?
you said:

Quote

I believe there are people posting intentionally misguiding material on this board. I keep an open mind, but I have seen too many examples.....If I'm wrong, then prove me wrong by posting things that make sense.

What makes sense to some may not to others.

What can't you just state your opinion (which you didn't, it was more of an accusation) without being so condescending?

This is the person who wrote the article, maybe you should ask him why he wrote this.
JB Williams is a business man, a husband, a father, and a writer. A no nonsense commentator on American politics, American history, and American philosophy. He is published nationwide and in many countries around the world. JB. Williams can be reached at: letters@canadafreepress.com


Sir, you are very rude and if you can't reply nicely then don't. By the way this board brings lots of good information and perhaps if you feel that "some" people post misleading things intentionally then maybe you should stay away no need to be so up-heady about it.

Have a good day sir.

Chuck, on Oct 5 2009, 01:50 PM, said:

galaxee said:

The Theory is Now a Conspiracy And Facts Don't Lie

That doesn't make any sense.

I believe there are people posting intentionally misguiding material on this board. I keep an open mind, but I have seen too many examples.

galaxee said:

The Theory is Now a Conspiracy

That does not make sense, except in a drug-like, quasi-hallucinatory way. Classic of Alex Jones-type material. And there are a number of examples of this.

Going down these Alex Jones-type roads does not help you.

I believe Obama is ineligible, but this "there are two documents!!" etc. stuff is misleading, doesn't get us anywhere, and is exactly the kind of thing I would put out if I wanted people on the wrong track,

If I'm wrong, then prove me wrong by posting things that make sense.

[GracetoSalvation]

OK. So there is an issue about credibility of the documents at hand. The report is coming from the Canada free press.
Who are they and what is their credibility?

[galaxee]

GracetoSalvation, on Oct 5 2009, 08:49 PM, said:

OK. So there is an issue about credibility of the documents at hand. The report is coming from the Canada free press.
Who are they and what is their credibility?

Well, that is why I ask in the original post, was this true. There are a lot of people here that I so much more informed on these things than I am so I wanted to know and ask if anyone knew if it was true or not. This board has many knowledgeable people and they can provide some clarity on things some of us would like to know. I don't know who the Canada free press is or their credibility, however, I was hoping someone would know. Do you happen to know?


Bb