[dennis mann]

fgump, on Sep 23 2005, 01:54 AM, said:

I am the LORD your God, who has brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before me. (Ex 20:2-3)

The words of Jesus (Greek words in <>)
Again <palin>, the kingdom <basileia> of heaven <ouranos> is <esti> like <homoios> unto a merchant <emporos> man <anthropos>, seeking <zeteo> goodly <kalos> pearls <margarites>: Who <hos>, when he had found <heurisko> one <heis> pearl <margarites> of great price <polutimos>, went <aperchomai> and sold <piprasko> all <pas> that <hosos> he had <echo>, and <kai> bought <agorazo> it <autos>. (Mt 13:45-46)

If Jesus used "pearl" as a positive connotation for the kingdom of heaven,
then perhaps "pearl" is important here in the RITA sense, too. If all things were created by him and nothing was made that was not made by him, then perhaps a pearl was made by him purely for his metaphorical use in the book of Matthew.

A pearl:
Grows in an unclean (non-kosher) creature
Starts out as an irritation
Grows by accretion
Results in a thing of great value
= the GENTILE CHURCH
Therefore,
Don't rule out that God's purposes for RITA may include judgment at the house of God!

Pearl also brings to mind that thing most valuable to Americans = OIL
RITA will shut down the Gulf of Mexico oil industry.

Will Rita go to Crawford to wake up W? The "Perfect Storm" visited Kinnebunkport
by traveling to Maine AGAINST weather patterns after W's dad supported Jerusalem's use as an "international" city at the Madrid conference.
Rita and Katrina are 2 of the 3 most powerful hurricanes in the history of weather
recording (250 years), and they have occured within a month. This appears to be well outside of statistical probability for a random event and should give the
heathen/leaders/EVERYONE a wake-up call.

Ancient man looked at the skies for the power of the Creator. Modern man looks at space programs to validate his own "superiority" in the universe (tower of Babel stuff). Could a 3rd bigger storm be on the horizon?

NASA may be up to more than publicly acknowledged. If God is angry with NASA,
there should be solid evidence as to why. We live in 3 dimensions. There are at least 10 dimensions mathematically. Is NASA trying to do something in hyperdimensions, the realm of spirits? Are they conversing with fallen angels?
NATIONAL SECURITY DEPENDS UPON the God of the Bible, not upon scientific technoexploration.

"The highest number of reported legal induced abortions in 2000 occurred in New York City: 94,466. Florida and Texas have the second and third highest abortion numbers, 88,563 and 76,121 respectively. California likely ranks among the top, but they won’t tell."

For I will pass through the land of Egypt this night, and will smite all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both man and beast; and against all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgment: I am the LORD. (Ex 12:12)

How long, you simple ones, will you love simplicity? and the scoffers delight in their scoffing, and fools hate knowledge? Turn you at my reproof: behold, I will pour out my spirit unto you, I will make known my words unto you. Because I have called, and you refused; I have stretched out my hand, and no man regarded; But you have ignored all my counsel, and would have none of my reproof: I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when your fear comes; When your terror comes as desolation, and your destruction comes as a whirlwind; when distress and anguish comes upon you. Then shall they call upon me, but I will not answer; they shall seek me early, but they shall not find me: Because they hated knowledge, and did not choose the fear of the LORD: They would have none of my counsel: they despised all my reproof. Therefore shall they eat of the fruit of their own way, and be filled with their own devices. For the turning away of the simple shall slay them, and the prosperity of fools shall destroy them. But whosoever hearkens unto me shall dwell safely, and shall be secure from the fear of evil. (Pr 1:22-33)

TABLE 2. Reported number, ratio, and rate of legal abortions and percentage of abortions obtained by out-ofstate
residents, by state of occurrence — United States, 1990
Number of Abortions obtained
State abortions* Ratio† Rate§ by out-of-state
residents (%)¶
Alabama 15,012** 237 16 NR
Alaska 1,489** 125 11 NR
Arizona 15,783 229 19 2.5
Arkansas 5,953 163 11 3.2
California 357,579†† 585 50 NR
Colorado 12,679 237 16 8.2
Connecticut 18,776 375§§ 24 NR
Delaware 5,557 500 34 NR
District of Columbia 19,969 NR¶¶ NR 52.9
Tennessee 21,144 282 18 17.4
Texas 92,580 293 23 3.9
Utah 4,786 132 12 15.2
Vermont 3,184 384 23 29.8
Virginia 32,992 334 21 6.0
Washington 31,443 397 27 4.9
West Virginia 2,500 111 6 11.7
Wisconsin 6,848 232 15 6.1
Wyoming 363 52 4 12.4
Total 1,429,577 345¶¶¶ 24
Florida 66,071 332 24 NR
Georgia 39,245 349 24 8.3
Hawaii 4,748 232 18 0.8
Idaho 1,390 85 6 9.0
Illinois 67,350 345 25 NR
Indiana 14,351 167 11 3.6
Iowa 7,166** 182 12 NR
Kansas 7,516††† 193§§ 14 46.5
Kentucky 10,921 202 13 29.3
Louisiana 13,020 181 13 NR
Maine 4,607 266 16 12.6
Maryland 22,425 279§§ 19 6.8
Massachusetts 39,739 430 27 3.9
Michigan 36,183 236 16 4.2
Minnesota 17,156 252 17 10.7
Mississippi 6,842 157 11 22.7
Missouri 16,366 207 14 10.8
Montana 3,365 290 19 23.6
Nebraska 6,346 260 18 20.2
Nevada 7,226 331 26 11.2
New Hampshire 4,259** 243 16 NR
New Jersey 41,358 337 23 3.0
New Mexico 5,288 194 15 3.9
New York 159,098 545 37 3.4
City 102,202§§§ 787 NR 2.9
State 56,896 351 NR 4.2
North Carolina 36,494 349 23 8.3
North Dakota 1,723 186 12 38.2
Ohio 32,165 193 13 9.6
Oklahoma 10,708** 225§§ 15 NR
Oregon 13,658 319 21 9.7
Pennsylvania 52,143 305 19 5.9
Rhode Island 7,782 512§§ 33 21.7
South Carolina 13,285 227 16 6.1
South Dakota 946 86 6


* Abortion data from central health agency unless otherwise noted.
† Abortions per 1,000 live births (live-birth data from central health agency unless otherwise specified).
§ Abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44 years (from Bureau of the Census, Current Population Survey, March 1990).
¶ Based on number of abortions for which residence status of women was known.
** Reported from hospitals and/or other medical facilities in state.
†† CDC estimate.
§§ Live births reported by NCHS (16).
¶¶ >1,000 abortions per 1,000 live births.
*** >1,000 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44.
††† Excludes 330 Kansas residents obtaining abortions in other states.
§§§ Reported from New York City Health Department.
¶¶¶ Differs from the preliminary ratio (344) published in MMWR (1).
NR: Not reported.
http://www.cdc.gov/r...ataToAction.pdf

And he caused his children to pass through the fire in the valley of the son of Hinnom: also he practiced soothsaying, and used sorcery, and used witchcraft, and dealt with mediums, and with wizards: he did much evil in the sight of the LORD, to provoke him to anger. (2Ch 33:6 KJ2000)

And you shall not let any of your children pass through the fire to Molech, neither shall you profane the name of your God: I am the LORD. (Le 18:21 KJ2000)

But he walked in the way of the kings of Israel, yea, and made his son to pass through the fire, according to the abominations of the nations, whom the LORD cast out from before the children of Israel. (2Ki 16:3 KJ2000)

Yea, they sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto demons, (Ps 106:37 KJ2000)

And shed innocent blood, even the blood of their sons and of their daughters, whom they sacrificed unto the idols of Canaan: and the land was polluted with blood. (Ps 106:38 KJ2000)

Also on your skirts is found the blood of the souls of the poor innocents: I have not found it by secret search, but plainly upon all these things. (Jer 2:34 KJ2000)

And they built the high places of Baal, which are in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to cause their sons and their daughters to pass through the fire unto Molech; which I commanded them not, neither came it into my mind, that they should do this abomination, to cause Judah to sin. (Jer 32:35 KJ2000)

Moreover you have taken your sons and your daughters, whom you have borne unto me, and these have you sacrificed unto them to be devoured. Is this act of your harlotries a small matter, (Eze 16:20 KJ2000)

That you have slain my children, and delivered them to cause them to pass through the fire for them? (Eze 16:21 KJ2000)

Will the LORD be pleased with thousands of rams, or with ten thousands of rivers of oil? shall I give my firstborn for my transgression, the fruit of my body for the sin of my soul? (Mic 6:7 KJ2000)

******************

Epiphany! (I think). Eureka!! (I reckon).
Correct me if I'm wrong.

In today's world, I've been aware of getting rid of unwanted pregnancies by abortion. The parents don't want the babies. It's cheaper to murder the babies than to feed them.


Many times, I had read in the OT, about sacrificing babies in the fire to Molech.
I had never connected it to un-wanted pregnancies. I had always thought of sacrificially giving the baby to Molech as a offering to appease and worship Molech.

BUT! Those babies were un-wanted!!!!
Right?
Abortions were difficult (or impossible), back then, so they pretended to "give (sacrificially)" the un-wanted babies to Molech.

Molech was the "abortion clinic" of yester-year!
Am I telling this right?

Wow!

The fire destroyed the evidence of what had happened (murder). The dogs wouldn't eat the baby. The baby was reduced to ashes in the fire.


***************

Some ancient religions required the practice of hetero or homo sex.
In other words, preach to 'em what they want to hear!
Whether it's true or not.
Hallelujah! And please pass me another virgin and a male temple prostitute.

dennis manning

[Sail2awe]

I been studying, but wanted to rush over to post this tidbit I ran across doing some research at
http://www.americanfreepress.net/



HARNESSING WEATHER

ALLEGATIONS SURFACE THAT U.S. & RUSSIA HAVE TECHNOLOGY TO MANAGE HURRICANES

rss202

By Mike Blair

Author Sydney Sheldon said, “The old adage that everyone talks about the weather but no one does anything about it is no longer valid,” in an afterword to his fascinating novel Are You Afraid of the Dark?

“Today,” Sheldon continued, “two superpowers have the ability to control weather around the world: the United States and Russia. Other countries, probably China and North Korea, are working feverishly to catch up.”

As this article was being written the aftereffects of Hurricane Katrina were still being felt in the southeastern United States, after it caused billions of dollars in damage along the Gulf of Mexico coast, and the death toll from the killer storm was still being tabulated.

Could this devastation have been avoided? Could Katrina itself have been avoided as a death-dealing hurricane?

The answers to both questions are probably “Yes.” The ability of Russia and the United States to create storms of this magnitude definitely exists.

The big question that remains is, why, then, wasn’t Katrina stopped before it devastated three states—Louisiana, Alabama and Mississippi—along the Gulf Coast?

There could be any number of reasons, but all would be mere speculation, as the fact is nothing was done to stop Katrina.

Those who doubt that Katrina, or any other hurricane, could be stopped—or created—can find substantiation in a long-forgotten article by Chen May Yee in the Nov. 13, 1997, issue of The Wall Street Journal.

The article recounts an offer by the Russians to aid Malaysia to create a typhoon to dissipate a pall of smoke that hung over the country—and still does—caused by the burning of large sections of the rain forests in Indonesia and Sumatra.

To quote from the article: Datuk Law Hieng Ding, Malaysia’s minister for science, technology and the environment at the time, said his country “would use special technology to create an artificial cyclone to clean the air.”

The article went on to say that a Malaysian company, BicCure Sdn. Bhd., would sign a memorandum of understanding with a government-owned Russian company to create a cyclone that would cause torrential rains and thus cleanse the air over Malaysia of the smoke and ash.

What Russian company was the Malaysian official talking about?

On Oct. 2, 1992, The Wall Street Journal reported that a Russian company, Elate Intelligent Technologies, Inc., has weather control equipment for sale and uses the advertising slogan of “weather made to order.”

Igor Pirogoff, director of the company, said “Elate is capable of fine-tuning weather patterns over a 200-squaremile area for as little as $200 U.S. per day,” the newspaper reported.

A year before the article was written, Hurricane Andrew caused $30 billion in damages as it plowed through the South. Pirogoff said Andrew could have been turned into “a wimpy little squall.”

According to a UN pamphlet, titled Basic Facts about the United Nations, which was published in 1994, the world body negotiated the Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques in 1977. This “prohibits the use of techniques that would have widespread, long-lasting or severe effects through deliberate manipulation of natural processes and cause such phenomena as earthquakes, tidal waves, and changes in climate and in weather patterns.”

Getting back to Malaysia, where the potential for creating or dissipating cyclones seems to have made its first appearance, there was never any follow-up to the stories about Elate and whether in fact the cyclone was created, although it was approved by the Malaysian government.

A call by American Free Press to the Malaysian Embassy in
Washington found no one there with any knowledge of the
subject.

However, there was more success when the Malaysian delegation to the UN was contacted in New York. There, a spokesman claimed to have no knowledge of the creation of a cyclone, but was willing to discuss weather control in his country.

The official said that, by using weather control technology, rain could be created and was being created over the nation’s capital of Kuala Lumpur.

He said that often rain was created over the city to cleanse the air of the smoke emanating from Indonesia, and particularly Sumatra.

He indicated he did not know if the technology being used had been obtained from Russia, but it would appear that such technology to create rain on demand would not have been developed in a Third World country like Malaysia.

There have been numerous reports in recent years about strange changes in the jet stream, which have created alterations in the weather.

In 1982 a report by a Pentagon researcher, identified as L. Ponte, noted that “the Soviets have made advances in bending the all-important jet stream that sweeps across Siberia to set global wind patterns. By using explosive devices in the jet stream, scientists are trying to make it dip and rise in a wave that could replace the frigid Siberian winters with milder air from the South.”

How this would affect weather in other parts of the world was not reported by Ponte, but there have been dozens of reports since his 1982 report about changes in the jet stream’s normal behavior.

In 1996, a group of seven U.S. Air Force officers, who had prepared a research paper about weather warfare, issued a report, which concluded that there was technology under development that would provide “warriors of the future” with the means to control the course of military conflicts, including through the use of weather modification.

The study also states that manipulation of precipitation, storms and fog could improve America’s own weather but could also involve controlling the ionosphere to guarantee U.S. dominance of worldwide communications.

Is major weather control really possible? Is weather manipulation a means of conducting war? If not, why in 1977 did the United States, the then-Soviet Union and dozens of other countries believe it was a good idea to enact a UN treaty banning weather manipulation as a means of conducting war?

In the afterword of his book, Sheldon concludes:

“Weather is the most powerful force we know. Whoever controls it can disrupt world economies with perpetual rainstorms or tornadoes; wipe out crops in a drought; cause earthquakes, hurricanes and tsunamis; close world airports and cause devastation on enemy battlefields. “We could all sleep better if a world leader said, ‘Everyone talks about the weather, but no one does anything about it, and it was true.”

(Issue #37, September 12, 2005)



Not Copyrighted. Readers can reprint and are free to redistribute - as long as full credit is given to American Free Press - 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 100 Washington, D.C. 20003